Introduce benchmarks for tuples #735

Performance Gate Passed

✅ 54 untouched benchmarks
🆕 10 new benchmarks

	Benchmark	`BASE`	`HEAD`	Efficiency
🆕	`test_unstructure_hetero_tuple[Converter]`	N/A	17.2 µs	N/A
🆕	`test_structure_hetero_tuple[True-BaseConverter]`	N/A	46.4 µs	N/A
🆕	`test_structure_homo_tuple[True-Converter]`	N/A	34.7 µs	N/A
🆕	`test_structure_hetero_tuple[False-BaseConverter]`	N/A	40.5 µs	N/A
🆕	`test_structure_homo_tuple[False-Converter]`	N/A	38.1 µs	N/A
🆕	`test_structure_homo_tuple[False-BaseConverter]`	N/A	38.4 µs	N/A
🆕	`test_structure_hetero_tuple[False-Converter]`	N/A	40 µs	N/A
🆕	`test_structure_homo_tuple[True-BaseConverter]`	N/A	36 µs	N/A
🆕	`test_unstructure_hetero_tuple[BaseConverter]`	N/A	14.8 µs	N/A
🆕	`test_structure_hetero_tuple[True-Converter]`	N/A	42.2 µs	N/A

_{Comparing tin/tuple-benchmarks (483ac28) with main (7d18f81)¹}

No successful run was found on main (5ea5dd3) during the generation of this report, so 7d18f81 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩