PEP 772: PyPA Committers Vote endorsed acceptance (#4903)

* Document PyPA Committers Vote

* Document clarification PR for second board resolution

* Update Post-History

* Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: Hugo van Kemenade <1324225+hugovk@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Pradyun Gedam <pradyunsg@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Hugo van Kemenade <1324225+hugovk@users.noreply.github.com>

Author: pradyunsg

peps/pep-0772.rst

@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ Post-History:
   `30-May-2025 <https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-772-packaging-council-governance-process-round-2/93904>`__,
   `25-Jul-2025 <https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-772-packaging-council-governance-process-round-3/100181>`__,
   `23-Mar-2026 <https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-772-packaging-council-governance-process-round-3/100181/108>`__,
+  `14-Apr-2026 <https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-772-packaging-council-governance-process-round-3/100181/117>`__,
 Replaces: 609
 
 
@@ -471,10 +472,16 @@ authors will submit this PEP
      clarification: The Python Steering Council (PSC) is the final arbiter for technical conflicts
      of interest, and the PSF Board is the final arbiter for conflicts of interest related to
      governance for the Packaging Council.  Approved, 10-0-0.
+   - Requested language added in `PR 4872 <https://github.com/python/peps/pull/4872/files>`__.
    - Resolution link TBD; resolution provided via email at time of writing.
 
 #. for a vote on the pypa-committers mailing list, in accordance with the process outlined in
    :pep:`609`
+
+   - This was voted on, as "endorsing the acceptance of PEP 772", with the all 30 votes cast being
+     in favor. Closing message on the `pypa-committers vote thread
+     <https://mail.python.org/archives/list/pypa-committers@python.org/message/5M7YQXJPSMMKLNZCYXX5HCOJV2LPWABW/>`__.
+
 #. for formal approval by the Python Steering Council
 
 We will reconcile and update the PEP as necessary based on recommendations, comments, and feedback,