Emphasis

Author: astrofrog

peps/pep-0771.rst

@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ recognized, e.g:
 For tools that behave like this (rather than raising an error), if an extra is
 recognized as invalid in a dependency specification, it should be ignored, and
 if all specified extras are invalid, then this should be considered equivalent
-to ``package[]`` (rather than ``package``) and not install any default extras.
+to ``package[]`` (rather than ``package``) and *not* install any default extras.
 
 Examples
 --------