Remove open issues section

Author: emmatyping

peps/pep-0784.rst

@@ -273,26 +273,6 @@ import name ``lz4``. Instead of solving this issue for each compression format,
 it is better to solve it once and for all by using the already-claimed
 ``compression`` namespace.
 
-Open Issues
-===========
-
-Should we keep old compression imports?
----------------------------------------
-
-It would be confusing to indefinitely have ``lzma`` and ``compression.lzma``
-simultaneously. Ideally, ``import lzma`` should emit a deprecation for a future
-Python version (maybe 3.24?). But should that deprecation exist indefinitely?
-Should the old import names (e.g. ``import lzma``) eventually be removed? If
-so, at which version?
-
-Could we keep the existing compression module imports as-is?
-------------------------------------------------------------
-
-The minimally disruptive change would be to add ``compression.zstd``, but not
-deprecate and remove ``lzma``, ``bz2``, and ``zlib``, and not create
-``compression.lzma`` etc. This has the potential to cause significant
-confusion for users however.
-
 Copyright
 =========