-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
Mark various accepted PEPs as Final #4986
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from 12 commits
bb6dedc
79fb6db
2daf312
c81fe4c
eb9e95d
c2de49f
1cda784
e8971d7
1991c9d
cfaef04
93b777f
dbe05ea
00ee2c3
405018e
3f5e7c6
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ PEP: 794 | |
| Title: Import Name Metadata | ||
| Author: Brett Cannon <brett@python.org> | ||
| Discussions-To: https://discuss.python.org/t/94567 | ||
| Status: Accepted | ||
| Status: Final | ||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This is not final yet; tools have not rolled out support.
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Okay, I reverted it. Out of curiosity, why does packaging have a different definition of "Final" than standards? For standards, "Final" means "implemented", not "used by users".
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Brett means this is not implemented by tools.
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I know -- my question was why we have a process difference between packaging and standards PEPs. Standards PEPs are marked as final when they're officialized in CPython, not when downstream users start using it. I guess it's because there's no CPython equivalent for packaging?
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. That’s what I am trying to say: this is not about a percentage of end users using the feature described in the PEP, but initial implementation by relevant projects, like the packaging library for core formats, pip/uv for installer things, pypi for index standards. |
||
| Type: Standards Track | ||
| Topic: Packaging | ||
| Created: 05-Jun-2025 | ||
|
|
||
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.