Skip to content

Fix backward_dense health-check regression under the ci profile#5936

Open
gchalump wants to merge 1 commit into
pytorch:mainfrom
gchalump:export-D109164907
Open

Fix backward_dense health-check regression under the ci profile#5936
gchalump wants to merge 1 commit into
pytorch:mainfrom
gchalump:export-D109164907

Conversation

@gchalump

@gchalump gchalump commented Jun 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary:
test_backward_dense regressed in OSS CI on 2026-06-15 (green before). D108096684
removed the per-test suppress_health_check from backward_dense_test.py and moved
it into the "derandomize" Hypothesis profile. OSS CI runs under the "ci"
profile, not "derandomize", so the suppression never applied -- the job log
shows hypothesis profile 'ci' -> suppress_health_check=(HealthCheck.too_slow,).
The test's heavy assume() usage then trips HealthCheck.filter_too_much and fails.

Fix: apply suppress_health_check explicitly in settings via the centralized
suppressed_list from tbe/common.py, making it independent of the active profile
while keeping a single source of truth.

Differential Revision: D109164907

@meta-cla meta-cla Bot added the cla signed label Jun 19, 2026
@meta-codesync

meta-codesync Bot commented Jun 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gchalump has exported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view the originating Diff in D109164907.

Summary:
test_backward_dense regressed in OSS CI on 2026-06-15 (green before). D108096684
removed the per-test suppress_health_check from backward_dense_test.py and moved
it into the "derandomize" Hypothesis profile. OSS CI runs under the "ci"
profile, not "derandomize", so the suppression never applied -- the job log
shows `hypothesis profile 'ci' -> suppress_health_check=(HealthCheck.too_slow,)`.
The test's heavy assume() usage then trips HealthCheck.filter_too_much and fails.

Fix: apply suppress_health_check explicitly in settings via the centralized
suppressed_list from tbe/common.py, making it independent of the active profile
while keeping a single source of truth.

Differential Revision: D109164907
@gchalump gchalump force-pushed the export-D109164907 branch from 9ca82f8 to 340a475 Compare June 19, 2026 19:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant