[Executorch] Add non-flash SDPA for decode#18648
Conversation
Add cpu_sdpa template function in op_sdpa_impl.h that provides a simpler SDPA implementation using standard GEMM (no tiling). This is useful as a baseline and for cases where flash attention is not optimal. The implementation uses a single SeqDim parameter for all tensors and supports causal masking, attention masks, GQA, and multi-threading. During decode (seq_len == 1), the tiled flash attention implementation has unnecessary overhead from its blocking/tiling logic. The simpler unfused SDPA path using direct GEMM is more efficient for single-query attention, yielding ~25-30% decode throughput improvement on S25 (41 -> 53 tok/s for 1.4B parameter model). This makes cpu_sdpa always available (previously gated behind ET_USE_UNFUSED_SDPA) and dispatches to it when seq_len == 1 and inputs are not quantized. Prefill continues to use flash attention. Differential Revision: [D96044318](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D96044318/) [ghstack-poisoned]
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/18648
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ❌ 1 New Failure, 2 Cancelled Jobs, 8 Unrelated FailuresAs of commit 126e8bb with merge base 1debeb6 ( NEW FAILURE - The following job has failed:
CANCELLED JOBS - The following jobs were cancelled. Please retry:
FLAKY - The following jobs failed but were likely due to flakiness present on trunk:
BROKEN TRUNK - The following jobs failed but were present on the merge base:👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
This PR needs a
|
digantdesai
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review automatically exported from Phabricator review in Meta.
Add cpu_sdpa template function in op_sdpa_impl.h that provides a simpler SDPA implementation using standard GEMM (no tiling). This is useful as a baseline and for cases where flash attention is not optimal. The implementation uses a single SeqDim parameter for all tensors and supports causal masking, attention masks, GQA, and multi-threading. During decode (seq_len == 1), the tiled flash attention implementation has unnecessary overhead from its blocking/tiling logic. The simpler unfused SDPA path using direct GEMM is more efficient for single-query attention, yielding ~25-30% decode throughput improvement on S25 (41 -> 53 tok/s for 1.4B parameter model). This makes cpu_sdpa always available (previously gated behind ET_USE_UNFUSED_SDPA) and dispatches to it when seq_len == 1 and inputs are not quantized. Prefill continues to use flash attention. Differential Revision: [D96044318](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D96044318/) [ghstack-poisoned]
Add cpu_sdpa template function in op_sdpa_impl.h that provides a simpler SDPA implementation using standard GEMM (no tiling). This is useful as a baseline and for cases where flash attention is not optimal. The implementation uses a single SeqDim parameter for all tensors and supports causal masking, attention masks, GQA, and multi-threading. During decode (seq_len == 1), the tiled flash attention implementation has unnecessary overhead from its blocking/tiling logic. The simpler unfused SDPA path using direct GEMM is more efficient for single-query attention, yielding ~25-30% decode throughput improvement on S25 (41 -> 53 tok/s for 1.4B parameter model). This makes cpu_sdpa always available (previously gated behind ET_USE_UNFUSED_SDPA) and dispatches to it when seq_len == 1 and inputs are not quantized. Prefill continues to use flash attention. Differential Revision: [D96044318](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D96044318/) [ghstack-poisoned]
Add cpu_sdpa template function in op_sdpa_impl.h that provides a simpler SDPA implementation using standard GEMM (no tiling). This is useful as a baseline and for cases where flash attention is not optimal. The implementation uses a single SeqDim parameter for all tensors and supports causal masking, attention masks, GQA, and multi-threading. During decode (seq_len == 1), the tiled flash attention implementation has unnecessary overhead from its blocking/tiling logic. The simpler unfused SDPA path using direct GEMM is more efficient for single-query attention, yielding ~25-30% decode throughput improvement on S25 (41 -> 53 tok/s for 1.4B parameter model). This makes cpu_sdpa always available (previously gated behind ET_USE_UNFUSED_SDPA) and dispatches to it when seq_len == 1 and inputs are not quantized. Prefill continues to use flash attention. Differential Revision: [D96044318](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D96044318/) [ghstack-poisoned]
Add cpu_sdpa template function in op_sdpa_impl.h that provides a simpler SDPA implementation using standard GEMM (no tiling). This is useful as a baseline and for cases where flash attention is not optimal. The implementation uses a single SeqDim parameter for all tensors and supports causal masking, attention masks, GQA, and multi-threading. During decode (seq_len == 1), the tiled flash attention implementation has unnecessary overhead from its blocking/tiling logic. The simpler unfused SDPA path using direct GEMM is more efficient for single-query attention, yielding ~25-30% decode throughput improvement on S25 (41 -> 53 tok/s for 1.4B parameter model). This makes cpu_sdpa always available (previously gated behind ET_USE_UNFUSED_SDPA) and dispatches to it when seq_len == 1 and inputs are not quantized. Prefill continues to use flash attention. Differential Revision: [D96044318](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D96044318/) [ghstack-poisoned]
Add cpu_sdpa template function in op_sdpa_impl.h that provides a simpler SDPA implementation using standard GEMM (no tiling). This is useful as a baseline and for cases where flash attention is not optimal. The implementation uses a single SeqDim parameter for all tensors and supports causal masking, attention masks, GQA, and multi-threading. During decode (seq_len == 1), the tiled flash attention implementation has unnecessary overhead from its blocking/tiling logic. The simpler unfused SDPA path using direct GEMM is more efficient for single-query attention, yielding ~25-30% decode throughput improvement on S25 (41 -> 53 tok/s for 1.4B parameter model). This makes cpu_sdpa always available (previously gated behind ET_USE_UNFUSED_SDPA) and dispatches to it when seq_len == 1 and inputs are not quantized. Prefill continues to use flash attention. Differential Revision: [D96044318](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D96044318/) [ghstack-poisoned]
Add cpu_sdpa template function in op_sdpa_impl.h that provides a simpler SDPA implementation using standard GEMM (no tiling). This is useful as a baseline and for cases where flash attention is not optimal. The implementation uses a single SeqDim parameter for all tensors and supports causal masking, attention masks, GQA, and multi-threading. During decode (seq_len == 1), the tiled flash attention implementation has unnecessary overhead from its blocking/tiling logic. The simpler unfused SDPA path using direct GEMM is more efficient for single-query attention, yielding ~25-30% decode throughput improvement on S25 (41 -> 53 tok/s for 1.4B parameter model). This makes cpu_sdpa always available (previously gated behind ET_USE_UNFUSED_SDPA) and dispatches to it when seq_len == 1 and inputs are not quantized. Prefill continues to use flash attention. Differential Revision: [D96044318](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D96044318/) [ghstack-poisoned]
Add cpu_sdpa template function in op_sdpa_impl.h that provides a simpler SDPA implementation using standard GEMM (no tiling). This is useful as a baseline and for cases where flash attention is not optimal. The implementation uses a single SeqDim parameter for all tensors and supports causal masking, attention masks, GQA, and multi-threading. During decode (seq_len == 1), the tiled flash attention implementation has unnecessary overhead from its blocking/tiling logic. The simpler unfused SDPA path using direct GEMM is more efficient for single-query attention, yielding ~25-30% decode throughput improvement on S25 (41 -> 53 tok/s for 1.4B parameter model). This makes cpu_sdpa always available (previously gated behind ET_USE_UNFUSED_SDPA) and dispatches to it when seq_len == 1 and inputs are not quantized. Prefill continues to use flash attention. Differential Revision: [D96044318](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D96044318/) [ghstack-poisoned]
Add cpu_sdpa template function in op_sdpa_impl.h that provides a simpler SDPA implementation using standard GEMM (no tiling). This is useful as a baseline and for cases where flash attention is not optimal. The implementation uses a single SeqDim parameter for all tensors and supports causal masking, attention masks, GQA, and multi-threading. During decode (seq_len == 1), the tiled flash attention implementation has unnecessary overhead from its blocking/tiling logic. The simpler unfused SDPA path using direct GEMM is more efficient for single-query attention, yielding ~25-30% decode throughput improvement on S25 (41 -> 53 tok/s for 1.4B parameter model). This makes cpu_sdpa always available (previously gated behind ET_USE_UNFUSED_SDPA) and dispatches to it when seq_len == 1 and inputs are not quantized. Prefill continues to use flash attention. Differential Revision: [D96044318](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D96044318/) [ghstack-poisoned]
Add cpu_sdpa template function in op_sdpa_impl.h that provides a simpler SDPA implementation using standard GEMM (no tiling). This is useful as a baseline and for cases where flash attention is not optimal. The implementation uses a single SeqDim parameter for all tensors and supports causal masking, attention masks, GQA, and multi-threading. During decode (seq_len == 1), the tiled flash attention implementation has unnecessary overhead from its blocking/tiling logic. The simpler unfused SDPA path using direct GEMM is more efficient for single-query attention, yielding ~25-30% decode throughput improvement on S25 (41 -> 53 tok/s for 1.4B parameter model). This makes cpu_sdpa always available (previously gated behind ET_USE_UNFUSED_SDPA) and dispatches to it when seq_len == 1 and inputs are not quantized. Prefill continues to use flash attention. Differential Revision: [D96044318](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D96044318/) [ghstack-poisoned]
Add cpu_sdpa template function in op_sdpa_impl.h that provides a simpler SDPA implementation using standard GEMM (no tiling). This is useful as a baseline and for cases where flash attention is not optimal. The implementation uses a single SeqDim parameter for all tensors and supports causal masking, attention masks, GQA, and multi-threading. During decode (seq_len == 1), the tiled flash attention implementation has unnecessary overhead from its blocking/tiling logic. The simpler unfused SDPA path using direct GEMM is more efficient for single-query attention, yielding ~25-30% decode throughput improvement on S25 (41 -> 53 tok/s for 1.4B parameter model). This makes cpu_sdpa always available (previously gated behind ET_USE_UNFUSED_SDPA) and dispatches to it when seq_len == 1 and inputs are not quantized. Prefill continues to use flash attention. Differential Revision: [D96044318](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D96044318/) [ghstack-poisoned]
Add cpu_sdpa template function in op_sdpa_impl.h that provides a simpler SDPA implementation using standard GEMM (no tiling). This is useful as a baseline and for cases where flash attention is not optimal. The implementation uses a single SeqDim parameter for all tensors and supports causal masking, attention masks, GQA, and multi-threading. During decode (seq_len == 1), the tiled flash attention implementation has unnecessary overhead from its blocking/tiling logic. The simpler unfused SDPA path using direct GEMM is more efficient for single-query attention, yielding ~25-30% decode throughput improvement on S25 (41 -> 53 tok/s for 1.4B parameter model). This makes cpu_sdpa always available (previously gated behind ET_USE_UNFUSED_SDPA) and dispatches to it when seq_len == 1 and inputs are not quantized. Prefill continues to use flash attention. Differential Revision: [D96044318](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D96044318/) [ghstack-poisoned]
Add cpu_sdpa template function in op_sdpa_impl.h that provides a simpler SDPA implementation using standard GEMM (no tiling). This is useful as a baseline and for cases where flash attention is not optimal. The implementation uses a single SeqDim parameter for all tensors and supports causal masking, attention masks, GQA, and multi-threading. During decode (seq_len == 1), the tiled flash attention implementation has unnecessary overhead from its blocking/tiling logic. The simpler unfused SDPA path using direct GEMM is more efficient for single-query attention, yielding ~25-30% decode throughput improvement on S25 (41 -> 53 tok/s for 1.4B parameter model). This makes cpu_sdpa always available (previously gated behind ET_USE_UNFUSED_SDPA) and dispatches to it when seq_len == 1 and inputs are not quantized. Prefill continues to use flash attention. Differential Revision: [D96044318](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D96044318/) [ghstack-poisoned]
Add cpu_sdpa template function in op_sdpa_impl.h that provides a simpler SDPA implementation using standard GEMM (no tiling). This is useful as a baseline and for cases where flash attention is not optimal. The implementation uses a single SeqDim parameter for all tensors and supports causal masking, attention masks, GQA, and multi-threading. During decode (seq_len == 1), the tiled flash attention implementation has unnecessary overhead from its blocking/tiling logic. The simpler unfused SDPA path using direct GEMM is more efficient for single-query attention, yielding ~25-30% decode throughput improvement on S25 (41 -> 53 tok/s for 1.4B parameter model). This makes cpu_sdpa always available (previously gated behind ET_USE_UNFUSED_SDPA) and dispatches to it when seq_len == 1 and inputs are not quantized. Prefill continues to use flash attention. Differential Revision: [D96044318](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D96044318/) [ghstack-poisoned]
Add cpu_sdpa template function in op_sdpa_impl.h that provides a simpler SDPA implementation using standard GEMM (no tiling). This is useful as a baseline and for cases where flash attention is not optimal. The implementation uses a single SeqDim parameter for all tensors and supports causal masking, attention masks, GQA, and multi-threading. During decode (seq_len == 1), the tiled flash attention implementation has unnecessary overhead from its blocking/tiling logic. The simpler unfused SDPA path using direct GEMM is more efficient for single-query attention, yielding ~25-30% decode throughput improvement on S25 (41 -> 53 tok/s for 1.4B parameter model). This makes cpu_sdpa always available (previously gated behind ET_USE_UNFUSED_SDPA) and dispatches to it when seq_len == 1 and inputs are not quantized. Prefill continues to use flash attention. Differential Revision: [D96044318](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D96044318/) [ghstack-poisoned]
Add cpu_sdpa template function in op_sdpa_impl.h that provides a simpler SDPA implementation using standard GEMM (no tiling). This is useful as a baseline and for cases where flash attention is not optimal. The implementation uses a single SeqDim parameter for all tensors and supports causal masking, attention masks, GQA, and multi-threading. During decode (seq_len == 1), the tiled flash attention implementation has unnecessary overhead from its blocking/tiling logic. The simpler unfused SDPA path using direct GEMM is more efficient for single-query attention, yielding ~25-30% decode throughput improvement on S25 (41 -> 53 tok/s for 1.4B parameter model). This makes cpu_sdpa always available (previously gated behind ET_USE_UNFUSED_SDPA) and dispatches to it when seq_len == 1 and inputs are not quantized. Prefill continues to use flash attention. Differential Revision: [D96044318](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D96044318/) [ghstack-poisoned]
Add cpu_sdpa template function in op_sdpa_impl.h that provides a simpler SDPA implementation using standard GEMM (no tiling). This is useful as a baseline and for cases where flash attention is not optimal. The implementation uses a single SeqDim parameter for all tensors and supports causal masking, attention masks, GQA, and multi-threading. During decode (seq_len == 1), the tiled flash attention implementation has unnecessary overhead from its blocking/tiling logic. The simpler unfused SDPA path using direct GEMM is more efficient for single-query attention, yielding ~25-30% decode throughput improvement on S25 (41 -> 53 tok/s for 1.4B parameter model). This makes cpu_sdpa always available (previously gated behind ET_USE_UNFUSED_SDPA) and dispatches to it when seq_len == 1 and inputs are not quantized. Prefill continues to use flash attention. Differential Revision: [D96044318](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D96044318/) [ghstack-poisoned]
Add cpu_sdpa template function in op_sdpa_impl.h that provides a simpler SDPA implementation using standard GEMM (no tiling). This is useful as a baseline and for cases where flash attention is not optimal. The implementation uses a single SeqDim parameter for all tensors and supports causal masking, attention masks, GQA, and multi-threading. During decode (seq_len == 1), the tiled flash attention implementation has unnecessary overhead from its blocking/tiling logic. The simpler unfused SDPA path using direct GEMM is more efficient for single-query attention, yielding ~25-30% decode throughput improvement on S25 (41 -> 53 tok/s for 1.4B parameter model). This makes cpu_sdpa always available (previously gated behind ET_USE_UNFUSED_SDPA) and dispatches to it when seq_len == 1 and inputs are not quantized. Prefill continues to use flash attention. Differential Revision: [D96044318](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D96044318/) [ghstack-poisoned]
Add cpu_sdpa template function in op_sdpa_impl.h that provides a simpler SDPA implementation using standard GEMM (no tiling). This is useful as a baseline and for cases where flash attention is not optimal. The implementation uses a single SeqDim parameter for all tensors and supports causal masking, attention masks, GQA, and multi-threading. During decode (seq_len == 1), the tiled flash attention implementation has unnecessary overhead from its blocking/tiling logic. The simpler unfused SDPA path using direct GEMM is more efficient for single-query attention, yielding ~25-30% decode throughput improvement on S25 (41 -> 53 tok/s for 1.4B parameter model). This makes cpu_sdpa always available (previously gated behind ET_USE_UNFUSED_SDPA) and dispatches to it when seq_len == 1 and inputs are not quantized. Prefill continues to use flash attention. Differential Revision: [D96044318](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D96044318/) [ghstack-poisoned]
|
Hi @kimishpatel! Thank you for your pull request. We require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and yours needs attention. You currently have a record in our system, but the CLA is no longer valid, and will need to be resubmitted. ProcessIn order for us to review and merge your suggested changes, please sign at https://code.facebook.com/cla. If you are contributing on behalf of someone else (eg your employer), the individual CLA may not be sufficient and your employer may need to sign the corporate CLA. Once the CLA is signed, our tooling will perform checks and validations. Afterwards, the pull request will be tagged with If you have received this in error or have any questions, please contact us at cla@meta.com. Thanks! |
Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):
Add cpu_sdpa template function in op_sdpa_impl.h that provides a
simpler SDPA implementation using standard GEMM (no tiling). This is
useful as a baseline and for cases where flash attention is not optimal.
The implementation uses a single SeqDim parameter for all tensors and
supports causal masking, attention masks, GQA, and multi-threading.
During decode (seq_len == 1), the tiled flash attention implementation
has unnecessary overhead from its blocking/tiling logic. The simpler
unfused SDPA path using direct GEMM is more efficient for single-query
attention, yielding ~25-30% decode throughput improvement on S25
(41 -> 53 tok/s for 1.4B parameter model).
This makes cpu_sdpa always available (previously gated behind
ET_USE_UNFUSED_SDPA) and dispatches to it when seq_len == 1 and
inputs are not quantized. Prefill continues to use flash attention.
Differential Revision: D96044318