Skip to content

Add GEMM-based standard SDPA benchmark and fix custom_sdpa_out signature#18715

Open
kimishpatel wants to merge 1 commit into
gh/kimishpatel/235/basefrom
gh/kimishpatel/235/head
Open

Add GEMM-based standard SDPA benchmark and fix custom_sdpa_out signature#18715
kimishpatel wants to merge 1 commit into
gh/kimishpatel/235/basefrom
gh/kimishpatel/235/head

Conversation

@kimishpatel

@kimishpatel kimishpatel commented Apr 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

Adds a standalone GEMM-based (non-tiled) attention benchmark alongside
the existing ET flash attention benchmark, allowing direct comparison
of the two algorithms. The standard SDPA uses cblas_sgemm for Q@K^T
and scores@V with 3-pass softmax, matching the approach used by
ONNX Runtime's GQA operator.

Both transposed [B,H,S,D] and standard [B,S,H,D] cache layouts are
supported via BLAS leading dimension parameter. Validation tests run
before benchmarks to ensure correctness against ET's custom_sdpa_out.

Also fixes broken custom_sdpa_out calls to match the new 3-bool
signature (is_seq_dim_2, is_k_seq_dim_2, is_v_seq_dim_2).

Authored with Claude.

Differential Revision: D99677686

Adds a standalone GEMM-based (non-tiled) attention benchmark alongside
the existing ET flash attention benchmark, allowing direct comparison
of the two algorithms. The standard SDPA uses cblas_sgemm for Q@K^T
and scores@V with 3-pass softmax, matching the approach used by
ONNX Runtime's GQA operator.

Both transposed [B,H,S,D] and standard [B,S,H,D] cache layouts are
supported via BLAS leading dimension parameter. Validation tests run
before benchmarks to ensure correctness against ET's custom_sdpa_out.

Also fixes broken custom_sdpa_out calls to match the new 3-bool
signature (is_seq_dim_2, is_k_seq_dim_2, is_v_seq_dim_2).

Authored with Claude.

Differential Revision: [D99677686](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D99677686/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
@pytorch-bot

pytorch-bot Bot commented Apr 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/18715

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 128 New Failures

As of commit e968c4a with merge base fb1618e (image):

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Apr 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR needs a release notes: label

If your change should be included in the release notes (i.e. would users of this library care about this change?), please use a label starting with release notes:. This helps us keep track and include your important work in the next release notes.

To add a label, you can comment to pytorchbot, for example
@pytorchbot label "release notes: none"

For more information, see
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/wiki/PyTorch-AutoLabel-Bot#why-categorize-for-release-notes-and-how-does-it-work.

@kimishpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

submitted by accident, not meant to land immedidately

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Looks like this PR hasn't been updated in a while so we're going to go ahead and mark this as Stale.
Feel free to remove the Stale label if you feel this was a mistake.
If you are unable to remove the Stale label please contact a maintainer in order to do so.
If you want the bot to never mark this PR stale again, add the no-stale label.
Stale pull requests will automatically be closed after 30 days of inactivity.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the Stale PRs inactive for over 60 days label Jun 6, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. fb-exported meta-exported Stale PRs inactive for over 60 days

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant