Skip to content

Add GEMM-based standard SDPA benchmark and fix custom_sdpa_out signature#18715

Open
kimishpatel wants to merge 1 commit intogh/kimishpatel/235/basefrom
gh/kimishpatel/235/head
Open

Add GEMM-based standard SDPA benchmark and fix custom_sdpa_out signature#18715
kimishpatel wants to merge 1 commit intogh/kimishpatel/235/basefrom
gh/kimishpatel/235/head

Conversation

@kimishpatel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@kimishpatel kimishpatel commented Apr 6, 2026

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

Adds a standalone GEMM-based (non-tiled) attention benchmark alongside
the existing ET flash attention benchmark, allowing direct comparison
of the two algorithms. The standard SDPA uses cblas_sgemm for Q@K^T
and scores@V with 3-pass softmax, matching the approach used by
ONNX Runtime's GQA operator.

Both transposed [B,H,S,D] and standard [B,S,H,D] cache layouts are
supported via BLAS leading dimension parameter. Validation tests run
before benchmarks to ensure correctness against ET's custom_sdpa_out.

Also fixes broken custom_sdpa_out calls to match the new 3-bool
signature (is_seq_dim_2, is_k_seq_dim_2, is_v_seq_dim_2).

Authored with Claude.

Differential Revision: D99677686

Adds a standalone GEMM-based (non-tiled) attention benchmark alongside
the existing ET flash attention benchmark, allowing direct comparison
of the two algorithms. The standard SDPA uses cblas_sgemm for Q@K^T
and scores@V with 3-pass softmax, matching the approach used by
ONNX Runtime's GQA operator.

Both transposed [B,H,S,D] and standard [B,S,H,D] cache layouts are
supported via BLAS leading dimension parameter. Validation tests run
before benchmarks to ensure correctness against ET's custom_sdpa_out.

Also fixes broken custom_sdpa_out calls to match the new 3-bool
signature (is_seq_dim_2, is_k_seq_dim_2, is_v_seq_dim_2).

Authored with Claude.

Differential Revision: [D99677686](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D99677686/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
@pytorch-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

pytorch-bot bot commented Apr 6, 2026

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/18715

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 128 New Failures

As of commit e968c4a with merge base fb1618e (image):

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions bot commented Apr 6, 2026

This PR needs a release notes: label

If your change should be included in the release notes (i.e. would users of this library care about this change?), please use a label starting with release notes:. This helps us keep track and include your important work in the next release notes.

To add a label, you can comment to pytorchbot, for example
@pytorchbot label "release notes: none"

For more information, see
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/wiki/PyTorch-AutoLabel-Bot#why-categorize-for-release-notes-and-how-does-it-work.

@kimishpatel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

submitted by accident, not meant to land immedidately

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. fb-exported meta-exported

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant