-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 989
Remove un-used copy from building dockers #18868
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IIUC, and this was a while ago, this was needed to make sure we get the latest files in the docker build for the PR we are testing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You might be right, but I am not able to find any evidence of this being used. If you look at the PR that introduced it, https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/pull/1111/changes, ./arm is copied to the docker's /opt/arm to then run setup.sh. This code does not exist anymore. The only thing the ARM_SDK arg does is run install_arm.sh, which just installs some drivers.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Now when all deps a pip packages (even tosa-tools and MLSDK) we can and probably should clean out all stuff from the docker and use a plain one.
As a later improvements we can just prerun some pip installs to speed things up if we want.
e.g. I propose to merge this, cleanup old strange stuff and then maybe rethink the docker acceleration setup so we get a clean one. Would that be ok @digantdesai ?