Remove unused using-declarations

[cyyever]

Delete using-declarations whose name is never used in the file (384 across 218 .cpp/.mm files, found by scripted scan). Deletion only — no call sites changed. Using-declarations in headers are left alone since includers may rely on them.

Authored with Claude Code.

cc @digantdesai @freddan80 @per @zingo @oscarandersson8218 @mansnils @Sebastian-Larsson @robell @rascani

[pytorch-bot]

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/20953

• 📄 Preview Python docs built from this PR

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❗ 1 Active SEVs

There are 1 currently active SEVs. If your PR is affected, please view them below:

• OOM on hf-cache causing jobs to fail at "Initialize Containers"

❌ 1 Awaiting Approval, 1 New Failure

As of commit 40902e2 with merge base e16c048 ():

AWAITING APPROVAL - The following workflow needs approval before CI can run:

• periodic (gh)

NEW FAILURE - The following job has failed:

• pull / unittest-nxp-neutron / linux-job (gh)
  RuntimeError: Command docker exec -t 0bca2f00fc76ff37f83ab37624f834f9ce71d619884ee3870525c1ca5038b717 /exec failed with exit code 1

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

[pytorch-bot]

Workflows were awaiting approval. CI has now been triggered for the ciflow labels on this PR.

[github-actions]

This PR needs a release notes: label

If your change should be included in the release notes (i.e. would users of this library care about this change?), please use a label starting with release notes:. This helps us keep track and include your important work in the next release notes.

To add a label, you can comment to pytorchbot, for example
@pytorchbot label "release notes: none"

For more information, see
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/wiki/PyTorch-AutoLabel-Bot#why-categorize-for-release-notes-and-how-does-it-work.

[rascani]

Thanks for doing this @cyyever!

It looks like a pybind submodule update snuck into the commit, I assume that was unintentional?

[cyyever]

@rascani That was unintentional commit, restored it.