Fix preview comment showing .json paths instead of .html#1952
Merged
Conversation
…URLs The link text for single-file entries used the source filename (e.g. `epub.json`) instead of the rendered page path (`epub.html`), making the comment inconsistent with multi-file entries which already showed the page path.
Contributor
|
Successfully created backport PR for |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Preview deploy comments showed source file paths (e.g.
epub.json) as link text instead of the rendered page path (epub.html) for single-file entries. Multi-file entries already used the page path.Noticed in #1951.
Fix
Use the resolved
pagevariable as link text instead of the raw source filename.Fixes the inconsistency introduced in #1948.