Skip to content

fix: ensure the new logic is used for the cursorline visibility check#166

Merged
rachartier merged 1 commit intorachartier:mainfrom
spflaumer:patch-1
Jan 4, 2026
Merged

fix: ensure the new logic is used for the cursorline visibility check#166
rachartier merged 1 commit intorachartier:mainfrom
spflaumer:patch-1

Conversation

@spflaumer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

this is very embarrassing, but in a previous commit, the logic was changed from simply checking the cursorline option to also considering the related cursorlineopt option to verify that the full cursorline is drawn and thus visible.

there is unfortunately one more spot in the code i've missed that needs to use the new logic too

i'm terribly sorry to notice it this late, especially considering that the original pr was just merged

in a previous commit, the logic was changed from simply checking the cursorline option to also considering the related cursorlineopt option to verify that the full cursorline is drawn. there is unfortunately one more spot in the code i've missed
@rachartier
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

That's my bad, I should have checked better! Thanks

@rachartier rachartier merged commit f06ffde into rachartier:main Jan 4, 2026
2 checks passed
@spflaumer spflaumer deleted the patch-1 branch January 4, 2026 22:24
@spflaumer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

no, that's almost completely on me, since i've opted to make a pr without properly checking if my changes actually did the thing they were supposed to do

again, sorry and thank you for your patience

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants