|
2 | 2 |
|
3 | 3 | ## Supported Versions |
4 | 4 |
|
5 | | -Only the latest version is guaranteed to be secure. For this purpose, Byte Buddy maintains backwards compatibility. Please note the [readme of the project](https://github.com/raphw/byte-buddy/blob/master/README.md) for further information. |
| 5 | +| Version Range | Supported | |
| 6 | +|--------------|----------| |
| 7 | +| Latest | Yes | |
| 8 | +| Older | No | |
| 9 | + |
| 10 | +Security fixes are applied only to the latest released version. Users are strongly encouraged to upgrade. |
| 11 | + |
| 12 | +--- |
6 | 13 |
|
7 | 14 | ## Reporting a Vulnerability |
8 | 15 |
|
9 | | -Please disclose responsibly by [contacting the maintainer](mailto:rafael.wth@gmail.com). After a fix is released, any vulnerability will be publicly disclosed and registered. As of today, no vulnerabilities are known to exists. |
| 16 | +Please report security vulnerabilities via GitHub Security Advisories. |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | +**Do not open public issues for security-related reports.** |
| 19 | + |
| 20 | +When reporting, include: |
| 21 | +- Affected versions |
| 22 | +- Detailed reproduction steps |
| 23 | +- Proof-of-concept (if available) |
| 24 | +- Impact assessment |
| 25 | + |
| 26 | +### Response Targets |
| 27 | + |
| 28 | +- Initial acknowledgment: within 48 hours |
| 29 | +- Triage and assessment: within 3–5 days |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | +### Fix Targets |
| 32 | + |
| 33 | +- Critical issues: < 7 days |
| 34 | +- High severity: < 14 days |
| 35 | +- Medium/Low: best effort |
| 36 | + |
| 37 | +--- |
| 38 | + |
| 39 | +## Severity Classification |
| 40 | + |
| 41 | +- **Critical** |
| 42 | + - Arbitrary code execution through instrumentation |
| 43 | + - Unsafe class loading leading to sandbox escape |
| 44 | + |
| 45 | +- **High** |
| 46 | + - Privilege escalation via agent misuse |
| 47 | + - Bypassing intended constraints in bytecode generation |
| 48 | + |
| 49 | +- **Medium** |
| 50 | + - Denial of service via malformed bytecode |
| 51 | + - Stability issues impacting runtime safety |
| 52 | + |
| 53 | +- **Low** |
| 54 | + - Edge-case validation issues |
| 55 | + - Non-exploitable incorrect behavior |
| 56 | + |
| 57 | +--- |
| 58 | + |
| 59 | +## Disclosure Policy |
| 60 | + |
| 61 | +- Vulnerabilities are handled via private coordination |
| 62 | +- Fixes are developed and validated before disclosure |
| 63 | +- Public disclosure occurs after a fix is available |
| 64 | + |
| 65 | +Advisories will include: |
| 66 | +- Affected versions |
| 67 | +- Description of impact |
| 68 | +- Mitigation steps |
| 69 | +- Upgrade guidance |
| 70 | + |
| 71 | +--- |
| 72 | + |
| 73 | +## Security Best Practices for Users |
| 74 | + |
| 75 | +- Restrict use of Java agents in production environments |
| 76 | +- Validate class loaders and transformation targets |
| 77 | +- Keep Byte Buddy updated to the latest version |
| 78 | +- Avoid exposing instrumentation capabilities to external users |
| 79 | + |
| 80 | +--- |
| 81 | + |
| 82 | +## Dependencies |
| 83 | + |
| 84 | +Byte Buddy repackages ASM internally to avoid dependency conflicts. |
| 85 | + |
| 86 | +Users should still monitor: |
| 87 | +- JVM-level vulnerabilities |
| 88 | +- Build and runtime environments |
| 89 | +- Dependency scanning results in their own systems |
| 90 | + |
| 91 | +--- |
| 92 | + |
| 93 | +# Threat Model |
| 94 | + |
| 95 | +## Overview |
| 96 | + |
| 97 | +Byte Buddy is safe to use as a regular library for class generation and extension when used within trusted code. The primary risks arise from features that allow modification of existing code or execution of injected logic. |
| 98 | + |
| 99 | +--- |
| 100 | + |
| 101 | +## High-Risk Areas |
| 102 | + |
| 103 | +### Java Agents |
| 104 | + |
| 105 | +Java agents can transform or redefine classes at runtime and operate with the full privileges of the hosting JVM. |
| 106 | + |
| 107 | +**Risks** |
| 108 | +- Injection of arbitrary code into application classes |
| 109 | +- Modification of security-sensitive logic |
| 110 | +- Full process compromise if misused or exposed |
| 111 | + |
| 112 | +**Guidance** |
| 113 | +- Do not allow untrusted agents |
| 114 | +- Restrict agent attachment in production environments |
| 115 | + |
| 116 | +--- |
| 117 | + |
| 118 | +### Build Plugins |
| 119 | + |
| 120 | +Byte Buddy can be used in build tools to modify bytecode during compilation or packaging. |
| 121 | + |
| 122 | +**Risks** |
| 123 | +- Execution of malicious code during build |
| 124 | +- Supply chain compromise via untrusted plugins or dependencies |
| 125 | + |
| 126 | +**Guidance** |
| 127 | +- Only use trusted plugins and dependencies |
| 128 | +- Verify build integrity and dependency sources |
| 129 | + |
| 130 | +--- |
| 131 | + |
| 132 | +## Summary |
| 133 | + |
| 134 | +- Regular library usage is considered safe under normal conditions |
| 135 | +- The main security risks stem from **code injection capabilities**, especially via agents and build-time instrumentation |
0 commit comments