Skip to content

Specify that we don't intend to coordinate with additional WGs #23

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wetneb wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Specify that we don't intend to coordinate with additional WGs #23

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
ceb37f5
Specify that we don't intend to coordinate with additional WGs
wetneb Jun 11, 2026
839c581
Remove section about WGs we should coordinate with
wetneb Jun 11, 2026
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
16 changes: 1 addition & 15 deletions working_group_charter.html
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -280,24 +280,10 @@ <h2>Coordination</h2>
<a href="https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process/#RecsCR" title="Candidate Recommendation">CR</a> and is encouraged
to proactively notify the horizontal review groups when major changes occur in a specification following a review.</p>

<p>Additional technical coordination with the following Groups will be made, per the <a href="https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process/#WGCharter">W3C Process Document</a>:</p>

<p class="todo">Add: any dependencies by groups within or outside of W3C on the deliverables of this group (people/services using the protocol?)</p>
<p>Additional technical coordination with the following Groups will be made, per the <a href="https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process/#WGCharter">W3C Process Document</a>: none.</p>

<p class="todo">In addition to the above catch-all reference to horizontal review which includes accessibility review, please check with chairs and staff contacts of the <a href="https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/">Accessible Platform Architectures Working Group</a> to determine if an additional liaison statement with more specific information about concrete review issues is needed in the list below.</p>

@acka47 acka47 Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we delete this bit as well?

@wetneb wetneb Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It asks us to "check with chairs and staff", which I haven't done myself.
Do you feel comfortable with removing this TODO item without doing so?


<section>
<h3 id="w3c-coordination">W3C Groups</h3>
<dl>
<dt><a href=""><i class="todo">[other name]</i> Working Group</a></dt>
<dd><i class="todo">[specific nature of liaison]</i></dd>
</dl>

<p class="issue"><b>Note:</b> Do not list horizontal groups here, only specific WGs relevant to your work.</p>
<p class="issue"><b>Note:</b> Do not bury normative text inside the liaison section.
Instead, put it in the scope section.</p>
</section>

<section>
<h3 id="external-coordination">External Organizations</h3>
<dl>
Expand Down