Skip to content

chore(chart): fix Orchestrator Infra Chart metadata to avoid conflicts with RHDH Chart#131

Merged
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 4 commits intoredhat-developer:mainfrom
Fortune-Ndlovu:fix-orchestrator-infra-chart-metadata
Apr 17, 2025
Merged

chore(chart): fix Orchestrator Infra Chart metadata to avoid conflicts with RHDH Chart#131
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 4 commits intoredhat-developer:mainfrom
Fortune-Ndlovu:fix-orchestrator-infra-chart-metadata

Conversation

@Fortune-Ndlovu
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description of the change

This PR updates the Chart.yaml metadata for the orchestrator-infra chart to avoid conflicts with the main Red Hat Developer Hub (RHDH) chart in Quay and Helm search results.

Why this change is needed: The original metadata reused several fields (e.g. name, charts.openshift.io/name, description) from the RHDH chart, which caused ambiguity and potential collisions when both charts were published as OCI artifacts.

Existing or Associated Issue(s)

Related issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHIDP-6169

Additional Information

For example, the orchestrator-infra-chart artifact in quay:

annotations:
  charts.openshift.io/archs: x86_64
  charts.openshift.io/name: Red Hat Developer Hub (CI Build)
  charts.openshift.io/provider: Red Hat
  charts.openshift.io/supportURL: https://access.redhat.com/support
apiVersion: v2
appVersion: 1.6.0
description: A Helm chart for deploying Red Hat Developer Hub (CI Build)
home: https://red.ht/rhdh
icon:  ...
keywords:
- backstage
- idp
- janus-idp
- developer-hub
- redhat-developer-hub
- redhat
kubeVersion: '>= 1.19.0-0'
maintainers:
- name: Red Hat
  url: https://redhat.com/
name: orchestrator-infra-chart
type: application
version: 1.6.0-CI

Hence, the Chart metadata needing to be updated. Otherwise, it might conflict with the metadata of the RHDH Chart. In particular charts.openshift.io/name something like Orchestrator Infrastructure for Red Hat Developer Hub (CI Build) would make better sense and distinguish it from the RHDH chart and description should be the same as https://github.com/redhat-developer/rhdh-chart/blob/main/charts/orchestrator-infra/Chart.yaml#L7-L8 name ideally something like redhat-developer-hub-orchestrator-infra

Checklist

  • Chart version bumped in Chart.yaml according to semver.
  • Variables are documented in the values.yaml and added to the README.md. The pre-commit utility can be used to generate the necessary content. Use pre-commit run -a to apply changes.
  • JSON Schema template updated and re-generated the raw schema via pre-commit hook.
  • List tests pass for Chart using the Chart Testing tool and the ct lint command.

Signed-off-by: Fortune-Ndlovu <fndlovu@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot requested review from gazarenkov and nickboldt April 16, 2025 10:37
@Fortune-Ndlovu
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

cc/ @rm3l

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Comment thread charts/orchestrator-infra/Chart.yaml Outdated
Comment thread charts/orchestrator-infra/README.md Outdated
@nickboldt nickboldt requested a review from rm3l April 16, 2025 12:55
Signed-off-by: Fortune-Ndlovu <fndlovu@redhat.com>
… to use the Orchestrator.

Signed-off-by: Fortune-Ndlovu <fndlovu@redhat.com>
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@rm3l rm3l left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm label Apr 17, 2025
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot Bot merged commit 7dd4b5e into redhat-developer:main Apr 17, 2025
5 checks passed
rm3l added a commit to rm3l/rhdh-chart that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2025
The chart was renamed in [1][2], but the README was still pointing to the
previous chart, which caused users to install an outdated version of the
chart when following this doc.

[1] https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHIDP-6169
[2] redhat-developer#131
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants