requestly
diff --git a/‎package-lock.json‎
Lines changed: 14190 additions & 11241 deletions b/‎package-lock.json‎
Lines changed: 14190 additions & 11241 deletions
diff --git a/‎package.json‎
Lines changed: 1 addition & 0 deletions b/‎package.json‎
Lines changed: 1 addition & 0 deletions
diff --git a/‎src/lib/secretsManager/USAGE_EXAMPLES.txt‎
Lines changed: 366 additions & 0 deletions b/‎src/lib/secretsManager/USAGE_EXAMPLES.txt‎
Lines changed: 366 additions & 0 deletions
@@ -272,6 +272,7 @@
     "webpack-merge": "^5.8.0"
   },
   "dependencies": {
+    "@aws-sdk/client-secrets-manager": "^3.969.0",
     "@devicefarmer/adbkit": "^3.2.6",
     "@electron/remote": "^2.1.2",
     "@requestly/requestly-core": "1.1.1",
 
@@ -0,0 +1,366 @@
+/**
+ * Usage Examples for Type-Safe Secrets Manager
+ *
+ * This file demonstrates how TypeScript automatically infers types
+ * throughout the secrets manager system.
+ */
+
+import {
+  SecretProviderType,
+  AWSSecretProviderConfig,
+  HashicorpVaultProviderConfig,
+  AwsSecretReference,
+  VaultSecretReference,
+} from "./types";
+import { createProviderInstance } from "./providerService/providerFactory";
+import { AWSSecretsManagerProvider } from "./providerService/awsSecretManagerProvider";
+// import { HashicorpVaultProvider } from "./providerService/hashicorpVaultProvider";
+
+// ============================================================================
+// Example 1: Creating Provider Configurations (Type-Safe)
+// ============================================================================
+
+// AWS Provider Config - TypeScript enforces correct config structure
+const awsConfig: AWSSecretProviderConfig = {
+  id: "aws-prod",
+  type: SecretProviderType.AWS_SECRETS_MANAGER,
+  name: "AWS Production",
+  createdAt: Date.now(),
+  updatedAt: Date.now(),
+  credentials: {
+    accessKeyId: "AKIA...",
+    secretAccessKey: "...",
+    region: "us-east-1",
+    sessionToken: "...", // optional
+  },
+};
+
+// HashiCorp Vault Config - TypeScript enforces correct config structure
+const vaultConfig: HashicorpVaultProviderConfig = {
+  id: "vault-dev",
+  type: SecretProviderType.HASHICORP_VAULT,
+  name: "Vault Development",
+  createdAt: Date.now(),
+  updatedAt: Date.now(),
+  credentials: {
+    address: "https://vault.example.com",
+    token: "s.xyz...",
+    namespace: "admin", // optional
+  },
+};
+
+// ❌ This will cause a TypeScript error - wrong config type for provider type
+// const invalidConfig: AWSSecretProviderConfig = {
+//   id: "invalid",
+//   type: SecretProviderType.HASHICORP_VAULT, // ❌ Error: type mismatch
+//   ...
+// };
+
+// ============================================================================
+// Example 2: Creating Provider Instances (Type-Safe Factory)
+// ============================================================================
+
+async function example2() {
+  // Generic factory - returns AbstractSecretProvider<SecretProviderType>
+  const awsProvider = createProviderInstance(awsConfig);
+  const vaultProvider = createProviderInstance(vaultConfig);
+
+  // TypeScript knows the provider type from the instance
+  console.log(awsProvider.type); // SecretProviderType.AWS_SECRETS_MANAGER
+  console.log(vaultProvider.type); // SecretProviderType.HASHICORP_VAULT
+
+  // Strongly-typed factory - returns specific provider type
+  const typedAwsProvider = createTypedProviderInstance(awsConfig);
+  // typedAwsProvider is AbstractSecretProvider<SecretProviderType.AWS_SECRETS_MANAGER>
+
+  const typedVaultProvider = createTypedProviderInstance(vaultConfig);
+  // typedVaultProvider is AbstractSecretProvider<SecretProviderType.HASHICORP_VAULT>
+}
+
+// ============================================================================
+// Example 3: Working with Secret References (Type-Safe)
+// ============================================================================
+
+async function example3() {
+  const awsProvider = new AWSSecretsManagerProvider(awsConfig);
+  const vaultProvider = new HashicorpVaultProvider(vaultConfig);
+
+  // AWS Secret Reference - TypeScript enforces correct structure
+  const awsRef: AwsSecretReference = {
+    type: SecretProviderType.AWS_SECRETS_MANAGER,
+    identifier: "arn:aws:secretsmanager:us-east-1:123456789:secret:myapp/config",
+    version: "AWSCURRENT", // optional
+  };
+
+  // Vault Secret Reference - TypeScript enforces correct structure
+  const vaultRef: VaultSecretReference = {
+    type: SecretProviderType.HASHICORP_VAULT,
+    path: "secret/data/myapp/config",
+    version: 2, // optional - KV v2 version number
+  };
+
+  // TypeScript ensures you pass the correct reference type to each provider
+  const awsSecret = await awsProvider.getSecret(awsRef); // ✅ Correct
+  const vaultSecret = await vaultProvider.getSecret(vaultRef); // ✅ Correct
+
+  // ❌ These would cause TypeScript errors:
+  // await awsProvider.getSecret(vaultRef); // ❌ Error: wrong reference type
+  // await vaultProvider.getSecret(awsRef); // ❌ Error: wrong reference type
+
+  // TypeScript knows the exact return types
+  if (awsSecret) {
+    console.log(awsSecret.ARN); // ✅ ARN exists on AwsSecretValue
+    console.log(awsSecret.value); // ✅ value is string | undefined
+    // console.log(awsSecret.data); // ❌ Error: data doesn't exist on AwsSecretValue
+  }
+
+  if (vaultSecret) {
+    console.log(vaultSecret.data); // ✅ data exists on VaultSecretValue
+    console.log(vaultSecret.metadata?.version); // ✅ metadata is optional
+    // console.log(vaultSecret.ARN); // ❌ Error: ARN doesn't exist on VaultSecretValue
+  }
+}
+
+// ============================================================================
+// Example 4: Batch Operations (Type-Safe)
+// ============================================================================
+
+async function example4() {
+  const awsProvider = new AWSSecretsManagerProvider(awsConfig);
+  const vaultProvider = new HashicorpVaultProvider(vaultConfig);
+
+  // Get multiple secrets - types are preserved
+  const awsRefs: AwsSecretReference[] = [
+    {
+      type: SecretProviderType.AWS_SECRETS_MANAGER,
+      identifier: "secret-1",
+    },
+    {
+      type: SecretProviderType.AWS_SECRETS_MANAGER,
+      identifier: "secret-2",
+    },
+  ];
+
+  const vaultRefs: VaultSecretReference[] = [
+    {
+      type: SecretProviderType.HASHICORP_VAULT,
+      path: "secret/data/app1",
+    },
+    {
+      type: SecretProviderType.HASHICORP_VAULT,
+      path: "secret/data/app2",
+    },
+  ];
+
+  const awsSecrets = await awsProvider.getSecrets(awsRefs);
+  // TypeScript knows: awsSecrets is (AwsSecretValue | null)[]
+
+  const vaultSecrets = await vaultProvider.getSecrets(vaultRefs);
+  // TypeScript knows: vaultSecrets is (VaultSecretValue | null)[]
+
+  // Type-safe iteration
+  awsSecrets.forEach((secret) => {
+    if (secret) {
+      console.log(secret.ARN); // ✅ ARN exists
+      console.log(secret.versionId); // ✅ versionId exists
+    }
+  });
+
+  vaultSecrets.forEach((secret) => {
+    if (secret) {
+      console.log(secret.path); // ✅ path exists
+      console.log(secret.data); // ✅ data exists
+    }
+  });
+}
+
+// ============================================================================
+// Example 5: Setting Secrets (Type-Safe)
+// ============================================================================
+
+async function example5() {
+  const awsProvider = new AWSSecretsManagerProvider(awsConfig);
+  const vaultProvider = new HashicorpVaultProvider(vaultConfig);
+
+  const awsRef: AwsSecretReference = {
+    type: SecretProviderType.AWS_SECRETS_MANAGER,
+    identifier: "my-secret",
+  };
+
+  const vaultRef: VaultSecretReference = {
+    type: SecretProviderType.HASHICORP_VAULT,
+    path: "secret/data/myapp/config",
+  };
+
+  // Set a single secret - both string and object values are supported
+  await awsProvider.setSecret(awsRef, "my-secret-value");
+  await vaultProvider.setSecret(vaultRef, {
+    database: "postgres://...",
+    apiKey: "xyz...",
+  });
+
+  // Batch set
+  await awsProvider.setSecrets([
+    { ref: awsRef, value: "value1" },
+  ]);
+
+  await vaultProvider.setSecrets([
+    {
+      ref: { type: SecretProviderType.HASHICORP_VAULT, path: "secret/data/app1" },
+      value: { key1: "value1" },
+    },
+    {
+      ref: { type: SecretProviderType.HASHICORP_VAULT, path: "secret/data/app2" },
+      value: { key2: "value2" },
+    },
+  ]);
+}
+
+// ============================================================================
+// Example 6: Using the Registry (Type-Safe)
+// ============================================================================
+
+async function example6() {
+  // Assume we have a registry instance
+  const registry: any = null; // FileBasedProviderRegistry instance
+
+  // Get a provider without knowing its type
+  const provider = registry.getProvider("aws-prod");
+  if (provider) {
+    // provider is AbstractSecretProvider<SecretProviderType>
+    console.log(provider.type);
+  }
+
+  // Get a provider with a specific type (type-safe)
+  const awsProvider = registry.getTypedProvider(
+    "aws-prod",
+    SecretProviderType.AWS_SECRETS_MANAGER
+  );
+
+  if (awsProvider) {
+    // TypeScript knows: awsProvider is AbstractSecretProvider<SecretProviderType.AWS_SECRETS_MANAGER>
+    const ref: AwsSecretReference = {
+      type: SecretProviderType.AWS_SECRETS_MANAGER,
+      identifier: "my-secret",
+    };
+
+    const secret = await awsProvider.getSecret(ref);
+    // TypeScript knows: secret is AwsSecretValue | null
+
+    if (secret) {
+      console.log(secret.ARN); // ✅ Type-safe access to AWS-specific fields
+    }
+  }
+}
+
+// ============================================================================
+// Example 7: Type Guards and Runtime Checks
+// ============================================================================
+
+async function example7() {
+  const registry: any = null; // FileBasedProviderRegistry instance
+
+  // Get a provider and use type guards
+  const provider = registry.getProvider("some-provider-id");
+
+  if (provider) {
+    // Runtime check with type narrowing
+    if (provider.type === SecretProviderType.AWS_SECRETS_MANAGER) {
+      // TypeScript narrows the type here
+      const awsProvider = provider as AWSSecretsManagerProvider;
+      // Now you have full access to AWS-specific methods if any
+    } else if (provider.type === SecretProviderType.HASHICORP_VAULT) {
+      const vaultProvider = provider as HashicorpVaultProvider;
+      // Now you have full access to Vault-specific methods if any
+    }
+  }
+}
+
+// ============================================================================
+// Example 8: Adding a New Provider (Easy Extension)
+// ============================================================================
+
+/**
+ * To add a new provider (e.g., Azure Key Vault):
+ *
+ * 1. Add the provider type to the enum in types.ts:
+ *    ```
+ *    export enum SecretProviderType {
+ *      AWS_SECRETS_MANAGER = "aws",
+ *      HASHICORP_VAULT = "vault",
+ *      AZURE_KEY_VAULT = "azure", // ← Add this
+ *    }
+ *    ```
+ *
+ * 2. Add the config interface in types.ts:
+ *    ```
+ *    export interface AzureKeyVaultConfig {
+ *      vaultUrl: string;
+ *      tenantId: string;
+ *      clientId: string;
+ *      clientSecret: string;
+ *    }
+ *    ```
+ *
+ * 3. Add to the discriminated unions in types.ts:
+ *    ```
+ *    export type AzureKeyVaultProviderConfig = ProviderConfig<
+ *      SecretProviderType.AZURE_KEY_VAULT,
+ *      AzureKeyVaultConfig
+ *    >;
+ *
+ *    export type SecretProviderConfig =
+ *      | AWSSecretProviderConfig
+ *      | HashicorpVaultProviderConfig
+ *      | AzureKeyVaultProviderConfig; // ← Add this
+ *    ```
+ *
+ * 4. Add reference and value types in types.ts:
+ *    ```
+ *    export interface AzureSecretReference extends BaseSecretReference<...> {
+ *      name: string;
+ *      version?: string;
+ *    }
+ *
+ *    export interface AzureSecretValue extends BaseSecretValue<...> {
+ *      value: string;
+ *      id: string;
+ *      // ... other Azure-specific fields
+ *    }
+ *    ```
+ *
+ * 5. Add to the type map in types.ts:
+ *    ```
+ *    export interface ProviderTypeMap {
+ *      [SecretProviderType.AWS_SECRETS_MANAGER]: { ... };
+ *      [SecretProviderType.HASHICORP_VAULT]: { ... };
+ *      [SecretProviderType.AZURE_KEY_VAULT]: { // ← Add this
+ *        config: AzureKeyVaultConfig;
+ *        providerConfig: AzureKeyVaultProviderConfig;
+ *        reference: AzureSecretReference;
+ *        value: AzureSecretValue;
+ *      };
+ *    }
+ *    ```
+ *
+ * 6. Create the provider class (azureKeyVaultProvider.ts):
+ *    ```
+ *    export class AzureKeyVaultProvider extends AbstractSecretProvider<
+ *      SecretProviderType.AZURE_KEY_VAULT
+ *    > {
+ *      readonly type = SecretProviderType.AZURE_KEY_VAULT as const;
+ *      // ... implement abstract methods
+ *    }
+ *    ```
+ *
+ * 7. Add to the factory in providerFactory.ts:
+ *    ```
+ *    case SecretProviderType.AZURE_KEY_VAULT:
+ *      return new AzureKeyVaultProvider(config as AzureKeyVaultProviderConfig);
+ *    ```
+ *
+ * That's it! TypeScript will now enforce type safety for your new provider
+ * throughout the entire system.
+ */
+
+export {};