Skip to content

fix(gatekeeper): suppress litellm debugging message#464

Merged
owtaylor merged 1 commit into
rhel-lightspeed:mainfrom
owtaylor:suppress-litellm-debug-messages
May 19, 2026
Merged

fix(gatekeeper): suppress litellm debugging message#464
owtaylor merged 1 commit into
rhel-lightspeed:mainfrom
owtaylor:suppress-litellm-debug-messages

Conversation

@owtaylor

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

LiteLLM has bugs where the custom_llm_provider is not properly passed back into query functions for things like "model supports reasoning". Set 'litellm.suppress_debug_info = True' to suppress debug messages - these aren't our bugs.

BerriAI/litellm#23879

LiteLLM has bugs where the custom_llm_provider is not properly
passed back into query functions for things like "model supports reasoning".
Set 'litellm.suppress_debug_info = True' to suppress debug messages -
these aren't *our* bugs.

BerriAI/litellm#23879
@owtaylor owtaylor requested a review from a team as a code owner May 18, 2026 15:01
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

For team members: test commit add51fe in internal GitLab

@codecov

codecov Bot commented May 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 96.65% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...rc/linux_mcp_server/gatekeeper/check_run_script.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@Jazzcort Jazzcort left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Always want to do this but keep skipping it. 😆

@owtaylor owtaylor merged commit 18509ca into rhel-lightspeed:main May 19, 2026
34 of 35 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants