You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
- Update dev build examples to current format (branch_hash)
- Remove obsolete worktree-name suffix from dirty example
- Correct description of dirty suffix behavior
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
| Release (CI with tag) |`1.0.0-rc1` (from tag `v1.0.0-rc1`) |
177
-
| Release (local tagged) |`1.0.0-rc1` (detected via git describe) |
178
-
| Dev (clean) |`1.0.0-dev+abc1234`|
179
-
| Dev (uncommitted changes) |`1.0.0-dev+abc1234-dirty:worktree-name`|
177
+
| Release (local tagged) |`1.0.0-rc1` (detected via git describe) |
178
+
| Dev (clean) |`1.0.0-development_abc1234`|
179
+
| Dev (uncommitted changes) |`1.0.0-development_abc1234-dirty`|
180
180
181
-
CI release builds receive the tag name via `VERSION_TAG` environment variable. Local builds detect tags via `git describe --exact-match HEAD`. The dirty suffix includes the worktree directory name to distinguish between multiple worktrees.
181
+
CI release builds receive the tag name via `VERSION_TAG` environment variable. Local builds detect tags via `git describe --exact-match HEAD`. Dev builds include the branch name and short commit hash, with a `-dirty` suffix if there are uncommitted changes to `extension/`.
0 commit comments