feat(examples): multitenant using remote builds#2619
Closed
abcxff wants to merge 1 commit into06-16-fix_toolchain_creating_ci_env_no_longer_fails_first_tryfrom
Closed
Conversation
This was referenced Jun 16, 2025
Contributor
Author
Deploying rivet with
|
| Latest commit: |
17ff3d9
|
| Status: | 🚫 Build failed. |
![greptile-apps[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/867647?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
PR Summary
Updates multitenant-deploys example to use remote builds instead of local builds, with significant architectural changes in deployment workflow.
- Security Issue: Hardcoded sensitive cloud token and project IDs exposed in
examples/multitenant-deploys/README.md - Infrastructure Change: Switched from
get.rivet.ggtoreleases.rivet.ggfor CLI installation inexamples/multitenant-deploys/Dockerfile - Architecture Update: Removed
@rivet-gg/api-fullworkspace dependency in favor of remote builds inpackage.json - Configuration Change: Added unstable.build_method config and modified dockerfile paths in
src/app.ts
4 files reviewed, 2 comments
Edit PR Review Bot Settings | Greptile
NathanFlurry
requested changes
Jun 18, 2025
![graphite-app[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/158384?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
abcxff
force-pushed
the
06-16-feat_examples_multitenant_using_remote_builds
branch
from
d9ac5ae to
72b8887
Compare
abcxff
force-pushed
the
06-16-feat_examples_multitenant_using_remote_builds
branch
from
72b8887 to
00e503a
Compare
abcxff
force-pushed
the
06-16-feat_examples_multitenant_using_remote_builds
branch
from
00e503a to
17ff3d9
Compare
NathanFlurry
approved these changes
Jun 20, 2025
Contributor
Merge activity
|
graphite-app Bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 20, 2025
<!-- Please make sure there is an issue that this PR is correlated to. --> ## Changes <!-- If there are frontend changes, please include screenshots. --> Fixes RVT-4791
graphite-app
Bot
deleted the
06-16-feat_examples_multitenant_using_remote_builds
branch
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Changes
Fixes RVT-4791