Fix lint error

Author: rmosolgo

spec/spec_helper.rb

@@ -61,28 +61,30 @@ def if_exec_next(exec_next_value, legacy_value)
   TESTING_EXEC_NEXT ? exec_next_value : legacy_value
 end
 
-class Minitest::Test
-  # These tests are skipped but should be fixed at some point
-  def exec_next_TODO(message) # rubocop:disable Naming/MethodName
-    skip("TODO: " + message) if TESTING_EXEC_NEXT
-  end
+module Minitest
+  class Test
+    # These tests are skipped but should be fixed at some point
+    def exec_next_TODO(message) # rubocop:disable Naming/MethodName
+      skip("TODO: " + message) if TESTING_EXEC_NEXT
+    end
 
-  # These tests are skipped and probably won't be fixed, but they're worth reviewing
-  def exec_next_WONTFIX(message) # rubocop:disable Naming/MethodName
-    skip("WONTFIX: " + message) if TESTING_EXEC_NEXT
-  end
+    # These tests are skipped and probably won't be fixed, but they're worth reviewing
+    def exec_next_WONTFIX(message) # rubocop:disable Naming/MethodName
+      skip("WONTFIX: " + message) if TESTING_EXEC_NEXT
+    end
 
-  # These tests don't run on legacy runtime
-  def exec_next_only(message)
-    skip("Exec-next only: #{message}") unless TESTING_EXEC_NEXT
-  end
+    # These tests don't run on legacy runtime
+    def exec_next_only(message)
+      skip("Exec-next only: #{message}") unless TESTING_EXEC_NEXT
+    end
 
-  # Exec-next annotates errors; use this to help produce those different error messages for assertions
-  def exec_next_error_message(field_path, message)
-    if TESTING_EXEC_NEXT
-      "Resolving #{field_path}: #{message}"
-    else
-      message
+    # Exec-next annotates errors; use this to help produce those different error messages for assertions
+    def exec_next_error_message(field_path, message)
+      if TESTING_EXEC_NEXT
+        "Resolving #{field_path}: #{message}"
+      else
+        message
+      end
     end
   end
 end