Skip to content

Pass DefinePerSample column to varied actions on request#22368

Merged
vepadulano merged 1 commit into
root-project:masterfrom
vepadulano:rdf-definepersample-varied-action
Jun 8, 2026
Merged

Pass DefinePerSample column to varied actions on request#22368
vepadulano merged 1 commit into
root-project:masterfrom
vepadulano:rdf-definepersample-varied-action

Conversation

@vepadulano

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

A varied action will be looking for column readers through its current variation name. In the case of an upstream Define, the node will return the correct reader based on the variation. In the case of an upstream DefinePerSample, given it can't depend on variations and it can't vary itself, we now return just the node itself.

Fixes #22367

A varied action will be looking for column readers through its current variation
name. In the case of an upstream Define, the node will return the correct reader
based on the variation. In the case of an upstream DefinePerSample, given it
can't depend on variations and it can't vary itself, we now return just the node
itself.

Fixes root-project#22367
@vepadulano vepadulano requested a review from hageboeck May 21, 2026 08:20
@vepadulano vepadulano self-assigned this May 21, 2026
@vepadulano vepadulano requested a review from martamaja10 as a code owner May 21, 2026 08:20
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented May 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Test Results

    22 files      22 suites   3d 13h 8m 36s ⏱️
 3 854 tests  3 849 ✅ 0 💤 5 ❌
77 033 runs  77 025 ✅ 2 💤 6 ❌

For more details on these failures, see this check.

Results for commit dabd77b.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@vepadulano vepadulano added the clean build Ask CI to do non-incremental build on PR label May 21, 2026
@vepadulano vepadulano closed this May 21, 2026
@vepadulano vepadulano reopened this May 21, 2026
@dpiparo

dpiparo commented May 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Re-started the failing builds as they seem to have failed because of a network glitch

@hageboeck hageboeck left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

Comment thread tree/dataframe/test/dataframe_vary.cxx
@vepadulano vepadulano merged commit aecad0a into root-project:master Jun 8, 2026
89 of 98 checks passed
@vepadulano

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/backport to 6.40

@vepadulano

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/backport to 6.38

@root-project-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Preparing to backport PR #22368 to branch 6.40 requested by vepadulano

@root-project-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Preparing to backport PR #22368 to branch 6.38 requested by vepadulano

@root-project-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR has been backported to branch 6.40: #22535

@root-project-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR has been backported to branch 6.38: #22536

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

clean build Ask CI to do non-incremental build on PR in:RDataFrame

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Wrong interaction of DefinePerSample with downstream varied action

4 participants