Replace if not value.nil? with unless value.nil?#299
Merged
Conversation
Two adjacent `if not value.nil?` trailing modifiers in `add_argument`'s XMLTYPE branch used the awkward double negation form. Replace with `unless value.nil?` for idiomatic Ruby; same semantics, same line count. No behavior change. Full suite is green (468 examples, 0 failures, 1 pre-existing pending). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
In
add_argument's XMLTYPE branch, two adjacent trailing modifiers used the awkward double-negation form:Replace each with
unless value.nil?— same semantics, idiomatic Ruby, same line count.Scope is intentionally narrow. The remaining
if !x.empty?atprocedure_call.rb:105pairs with anelsif !x.empty?at line 107 whereunlesscannot be substituted, so it is left alone for symmetry.Diff stat:
lib/plsql/procedure_call.rb | 4 ++--(+2 / -2, two single-line changes).Test plan
bundle exec rspec— 468 examples, 0 failures, 1 pre-existing pendingif notconstructs inlib/plsql/procedure_call.rboutside of a code comment that legitimately mentions "if not overloaded"🤖 Generated with Claude Code