feat: support TypeScript 7

[Timeless0911]

Summary

• Upgrade ts-checker-rspack-plugin to ^1.5.1.
• Delegate default TypeScript runtime resolution to ts-checker-rspack-plugin via typescript.resolveRoot instead of resolving and rewriting typescriptPath in this plugin.
• Update the README default options and TypeScript Go guidance for the new behavior.
• Add a TypeScript 7 RC fixture to cover automatic TypeScript Go type checking.

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The PR updates plugin TypeScript option handling to use resolveRoot for default resolution and simplifies production logging. It also refreshes the README for TypeScript Go support, bumps ts-checker-rspack-plugin, adds a workspace entry, and introduces a TypeScript v7 RC test fixture with build coverage.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title is concise and accurately summarizes the main change: adding TypeScript 7 support.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description matches the code changes, covering the dependency upgrade, TypeScript resolution change, docs updates, and new TypeScript 7 RC fixture.

✨ Finishing Touches

📝 Generate docstrings

• Create stacked PR
• Commit on current branch

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch david/feat-ts-checker-rspack-1-5

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 2

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Around line 120-126: The documented default object for
tsCheckerOptions(options) is out of sync with runtime behavior because it shows
a tsgo field that is never actually set. Update the README snippet to match the
real defaultOptions.typescript shape by removing the tsgo entry and documenting
only the runtime-derived typescriptPath behavior so the example reflects what
users receive.

In `@src/index.ts`:
- Around line 98-119: applyTypeScriptPathCompat currently normalizes
TYPESCRIPT_PACKAGE_JSON only in the TS7 auto-enable branch, so the opt-out and
pre-TS7 fallback branches should also treat that path as equivalent to the
TypeScript package.json form. Update the conditional checks in
applyTypeScriptPathCompat so the tsgo === false branch and the tsgo &&
!projectPaths.supportsTsgo branch both match configuredPath ===
TYPESCRIPT_PACKAGE_JSON alongside the existing package.json/TypeScript package
cases, ensuring the path is rewritten consistently to
projectPaths.typescriptPath or projectPaths.previewPackageJsonPath as
appropriate.

🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

• Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
• Create a new PR with the fixes

---

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: dc6e3da9-71ca-4ef2-917c-684f181d5071

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 616fbd2 and 1d299fb.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

• README.md
• package.json
• src/index.ts

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 1d299fbd9e

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In `@src/index.ts`:
- Around line 102-108: The configuredPath branch in src/index.ts enables tsgo
for supported TypeScript Go packages but does not set
normalizedOptions.tsgoPackage, so the plugin cannot resolve the executable for
non-standard paths. Update the configuredPath handling to detect whether the
package is the stable typescript package or the preview package, assign
normalizedOptions.tsgoPackage accordingly, and keep the tsgo toggle behavior in
sync within the same logic block that uses isTypeScriptGoSupportedPackage and
typescriptOptions.tsgo.

🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

• Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
• Create a new PR with the fixes

---

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 293762d8-2015-4908-881d-2074ec091356

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1d299fb and 25e448c.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml

📒 Files selected for processing (6)

• pnpm-workspace.yaml
• src/index.ts
• test/typescript-v7-rc/index.test.ts
• test/typescript-v7-rc/package.json
• test/typescript-v7-rc/src/index.ts
• test/typescript-v7-rc/tsconfig.json

✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)

• test/typescript-v7-rc/package.json
• test/typescript-v7-rc/tsconfig.json
• test/typescript-v7-rc/src/index.ts
• pnpm-workspace.yaml

[Timeless0911]

@codex review

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Bravo.

Reviewed commit: b8c350476c

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[chenjiahan]

@Timeless0911 This branch has conflicts that must be resolved