Skip to content

Security: bump actionview, activesupport, mcp, uri#5

Open
technicalpickles wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
security/dep-sweep
Open

Security: bump actionview, activesupport, mcp, uri#5
technicalpickles wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
security/dep-sweep

Conversation

@technicalpickles

@technicalpickles technicalpickles commented Jun 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Security dependency updates to address known vulnerabilities. All 58 tests pass.

Gems Bumped

Gem Old New GHSA Severity
actionview 8.0.2 8.1.3 GHSA-v55j-83pf-r9cq High
activesupport 8.0.2 8.1.3 GHSA-2j26-frm8-cmj9, GHSA-89vf-4333-qx8v, GHSA-cg4j-q9v8-6v38 High
mcp 0.1.0 0.9.2 GHSA-qvqr-5cv7-wh35 High
uri 1.0.3 1.1.1 GHSA-j4pr-3wm6-xx2r Medium

Compatibility Fixes (mcp 0.9.2)

mcp 0.9.2 introduced stricter JSON Schema (draft-04) validation and changed the InputSchema API:

  • Removed required: [] from PrintEnvTool and PackagesTool (empty required arrays are invalid in draft-04)
  • Updated specs to use schema.to_h[:properties] / schema.to_h[:required] since the new InputSchema no longer exposes .properties/.required accessor methods

Test Plan

  • bundle exec rspec passes (58 examples, 0 failures)
  • bundle exec rubocop passes (37 files, no offenses)

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Resolves security vulnerabilities in dependencies:
- actionview: 8.0.2 -> 8.1.3 (GHSA-v55j-83pf-r9cq)
- activesupport: 8.0.2 -> 8.1.3 (GHSA-2j26-frm8-cmj9, GHSA-89vf-4333-qx8v, GHSA-cg4j-q9v8-6v38)
- mcp: 0.1.0 -> 0.9.2 (GHSA-qvqr-5cv7-wh35)
- uri: 1.0.3 -> 1.1.1 (GHSA-j4pr-3wm6-xx2r)

mcp 0.9.2 introduces stricter JSON Schema validation (draft-04):
- required arrays must have at least 1 item; removed empty required: []
  from PrintEnvTool and PackagesTool
- InputSchema no longer exposes .properties/.required accessors; updated
  specs to use schema.to_h[:properties] / schema.to_h[:required]

All 58 examples pass.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@technicalpickles technicalpickles marked this pull request as ready for review June 18, 2026 20:50
@technicalpickles technicalpickles requested a review from a team as a code owner June 18, 2026 20:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant