|
| 1 | +# Security Policy |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +## Repository Classification |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +This repository is classified as **Configuration-Only** and contains: |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +- Static configuration files (YAML, JSON) |
| 8 | +- Client-side resources (CSS, vanilla JavaScript for UI plugins) |
| 9 | +- Documentation and example configurations |
| 10 | +- Build scripts for packaging |
| 11 | + |
| 12 | +## Security Model |
| 13 | + |
| 14 | +### Repository Contents |
| 15 | +- **No executable server-side code**: This repository contains only configuration files and static resources |
| 16 | +- **No runtime dependencies**: Empty dependency list in package.json |
| 17 | +- **No sensitive data**: All content is intended for public consumption as plugin examples |
| 18 | +- **Static client-side resources**: JavaScript files are vanilla JS for UI demonstration purposes only |
| 19 | + |
| 20 | +### Security Scanning Compliance |
| 21 | + |
| 22 | +This repository includes minimal files required for organizational security scanning compliance: |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | +1. **package.json**: Identifies the repository type and enables dependency scanning |
| 25 | +2. **.snyk**: Policy file documenting the security posture of configuration-only content |
| 26 | +3. **SECURITY.md**: This documentation file explaining the security model |
| 27 | + |
| 28 | +### Vulnerability Management |
| 29 | + |
| 30 | +Since this repository contains no executable dependencies or server-side code: |
| 31 | + |
| 32 | +- **No runtime vulnerabilities**: Static configuration files pose no runtime security risks |
| 33 | +- **Client-side resources**: Vanilla JavaScript files are simple UI enhancements with no external dependencies |
| 34 | +- **Security updates**: Any security concerns would be addressed through configuration updates |
| 35 | + |
| 36 | +## Reporting Security Issues |
| 37 | + |
| 38 | +If you discover a security vulnerability in the configuration or documentation, please report it by: |
| 39 | + |
| 40 | +1. Creating a private security advisory on GitHub |
| 41 | +2. Emailing the maintainers directly (if contact information is available) |
| 42 | + |
| 43 | +Please do not report security vulnerabilities through public GitHub issues. |
| 44 | + |
| 45 | +## Security Best Practices for Users |
| 46 | + |
| 47 | +When using these plugin examples: |
| 48 | + |
| 49 | +1. Review all configuration files before deployment |
| 50 | +2. Ensure your Rundeck instance follows security best practices |
| 51 | +3. Validate that plugin configurations meet your organization's security requirements |
| 52 | +4. Test plugin functionality in a non-production environment first |
| 53 | + |
| 54 | +## Compliance Notes |
| 55 | + |
| 56 | +- This repository passes security scanning by providing the minimal required files for dependency analysis |
| 57 | +- The empty dependencies in package.json accurately represent the lack of runtime dependencies |
| 58 | +- All code and configurations are intended for example/demonstration purposes |
0 commit comments