Skip to content

feat(devbox): added suspend async and promoted suspend to automatically await the devbox running - #670

Merged
dines-rl merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
dines/add-suspend-async
Dec 8, 2025
Merged

feat(devbox): added suspend async and promoted suspend to automatically await the devbox running#670
dines-rl merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
dines/add-suspend-async

Conversation

@dines-rl

@dines-rl dines-rl commented Nov 27, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

CodeAnt-AI Description

Resume devbox waits for running state and adds resumeAsync

What Changed

  • resume() now returns the devbox view once it reaches the running state, so callers automatically know when the machine is available.
  • Added resumeAsync() for clients that want to trigger a resume without waiting, with an explicit follow-up call to check running status.
  • Smoke tests cover both the auto-waiting resume path and the new async resume path to guard against regressions.

Impact

✅ Immediate running confirmation after resume
✅ Explicit resume option without waiting
✅ Verified resume timing in smoke tests

💡 Usage Guide

Checking Your Pull Request

Every time you make a pull request, our system automatically looks through it. We check for security issues, mistakes in how you're setting up your infrastructure, and common code problems. We do this to make sure your changes are solid and won't cause any trouble later.

Talking to CodeAnt AI

Got a question or need a hand with something in your pull request? You can easily get in touch with CodeAnt AI right here. Just type the following in a comment on your pull request, and replace "Your question here" with whatever you want to ask:

@codeant-ai ask: Your question here

This lets you have a chat with CodeAnt AI about your pull request, making it easier to understand and improve your code.

Example

@codeant-ai ask: Can you suggest a safer alternative to storing this secret?

Preserve Org Learnings with CodeAnt

You can record team preferences so CodeAnt AI applies them in future reviews. Reply directly to the specific CodeAnt AI suggestion (in the same thread) and replace "Your feedback here" with your input:

@codeant-ai: Your feedback here

This helps CodeAnt AI learn and adapt to your team's coding style and standards.

Example

@codeant-ai: Do not flag unused imports.

Retrigger review

Ask CodeAnt AI to review the PR again, by typing:

@codeant-ai: review

Check Your Repository Health

To analyze the health of your code repository, visit our dashboard at https://app.codeant.ai. This tool helps you identify potential issues and areas for improvement in your codebase, ensuring your repository maintains high standards of code health.

@codeant-ai

codeant-ai Bot commented Nov 27, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

CodeAnt AI is reviewing your PR.


Thanks for using CodeAnt! 🎉

We're free for open-source projects. if you're enjoying it, help us grow by sharing.

Share on X ·
Reddit ·
LinkedIn

@dines-rl
dines-rl requested review from adam-rl and jrvb-rl November 27, 2025 01:32
@codeant-ai codeant-ai Bot added the size:M This PR changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files label Nov 27, 2025

// Status might still be suspended or transitioning
const infoAfterResume = await devbox.getInfo();
expect(['suspended', 'running', 'starting']).toContain(infoAfterResume.status);

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggestion: The status assertion in the new resumeAsync test ignores the real resuming state that the API returns immediately after calling resumeAsync, so whenever the devbox is in that legitimate state the test will fail because infoAfterResume.status will not be in the hard‑coded list. [logic error]

Severity Level: Minor ⚠️

Suggested change
expect(['suspended', 'running', 'starting']).toContain(infoAfterResume.status);
expect(['suspended', 'resuming', 'running']).toContain(infoAfterResume.status);
Why it matters? ⭐

The SDK's Devbox status enum actually includes resuming (and not starting), so the current assertion flakes whenever the API reports the legitimate resuming state immediately after resumeAsync. Expanding the allowed values to include resuming fixes that real test failure.

Prompt for AI Agent 🤖
This is a comment left during a code review.

**Path:** tests/smoketests/object-oriented/devbox.test.ts
**Line:** 166:166
**Comment:**
	*Logic Error: The status assertion in the new `resumeAsync` test ignores the real `resuming` state that the API returns immediately after calling `resumeAsync`, so whenever the devbox is in that legitimate state the test will fail because `infoAfterResume.status` will not be in the hard‑coded list.

Validate the correctness of the flagged issue. If correct, How can I resolve this? If you propose a fix, implement it and please make it concise.

@codeant-ai

codeant-ai Bot commented Nov 27, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

CodeAnt AI finished reviewing your PR.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ Object Smoke Tests & Coverage Report

Test Results

✅ All smoke tests passed

Coverage Results

Metric Coverage Required Status
Functions 93.1% 100%
Lines 83.11% - ℹ️
Branches 51.02% - ℹ️
Statements 82.73% - ℹ️

Coverage Requirement: 100% function coverage (all public methods must be called in smoke tests)

⚠️ Some object methods are not covered in smoke tests. Please add tests that call all public methods.

View detailed coverage report

Coverage reports are available in the workflow artifacts. Lines/branches/statements coverage is tracked but not required to be 100%.

📋 View workflow run

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ Object Smoke Tests & Coverage Report

Test Results

✅ All smoke tests passed

Coverage Results

Metric Coverage Required Status
Functions 94.82% 100%
Lines 84.16% - ℹ️
Branches 51.02% - ℹ️
Statements 83.76% - ℹ️

Coverage Requirement: 100% function coverage (all public methods must be called in smoke tests)

⚠️ Some object methods are not covered in smoke tests. Please add tests that call all public methods.

View detailed coverage report

Coverage reports are available in the workflow artifacts. Lines/branches/statements coverage is tracked but not required to be 100%.

📋 View workflow run

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ Object Smoke Tests & Coverage Report

Test Results

✅ All smoke tests passed

Coverage Results

Metric Coverage Required Status
Functions 99.13% 100%
Lines 86.27% - ℹ️
Branches 51.02% - ℹ️
Statements 85.82% - ℹ️

Coverage Requirement: 100% function coverage (all public methods must be called in smoke tests)

⚠️ Some object methods are not covered in smoke tests. Please add tests that call all public methods.

View detailed coverage report

Coverage reports are available in the workflow artifacts. Lines/branches/statements coverage is tracked but not required to be 100%.

📋 View workflow run

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ Object Smoke Tests & Coverage Report

Test Results

✅ All smoke tests passed

Coverage Results

Metric Coverage Required Status
Functions 98.27% 100%
Lines 85.48% - ℹ️
Branches 51.02% - ℹ️
Statements 85.05% - ℹ️

Coverage Requirement: 100% function coverage (all public methods must be called in smoke tests)

⚠️ Some object methods are not covered in smoke tests. Please add tests that call all public methods.

View detailed coverage report

Coverage reports are available in the workflow artifacts. Lines/branches/statements coverage is tracked but not required to be 100%.

📋 View workflow run

@dines-rl
dines-rl merged commit e814e00 into main Dec 8, 2025
9 checks passed
@dines-rl
dines-rl deleted the dines/add-suspend-async branch December 8, 2025 21:16
@stainless-app stainless-app Bot mentioned this pull request Dec 8, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size:M This PR changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants