Commit faaf6d6
authored
let_underscore_future: skip bindings with an explicit type annotation (#17001)
Currently `let_underscore_future` fires on `let _: T = expr` even when
the user writes the type explicitly. The reporter's argument is that a
typed `let _:` is an intentional discard, separate practice from the
unannotated form. This is the same rationale `let_underscore_untyped`
documents.
This gates the lint on `local.ty.is_none()` so `let _: Pin<Box<dyn
Future<Output = ()>>> = foo();` no longer warns, while bare `let _ =
foo();` still does.
Test case added under `tests/ui/let_underscore_future.rs` covering both
shapes; `.stderr` updated for the line-number shift.
Fixes #16991
----
changelog: none3 files changed
Lines changed: 13 additions & 4 deletions
File tree
- clippy_lints/src
- tests/ui
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
162 | 162 | | |
163 | 163 | | |
164 | 164 | | |
165 | | - | |
| 165 | + | |
| 166 | + | |
166 | 167 | | |
167 | 168 | | |
168 | 169 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
1 | 1 | | |
| 2 | + | |
2 | 3 | | |
3 | 4 | | |
4 | 5 | | |
| |||
10 | 11 | | |
11 | 12 | | |
12 | 13 | | |
| 14 | + | |
| 15 | + | |
| 16 | + | |
| 17 | + | |
13 | 18 | | |
14 | 19 | | |
15 | 20 | | |
| |||
21 | 26 | | |
22 | 27 | | |
23 | 28 | | |
| 29 | + | |
| 30 | + | |
| 31 | + | |
24 | 32 | | |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
1 | 1 | | |
2 | | - | |
| 2 | + | |
3 | 3 | | |
4 | 4 | | |
5 | 5 | | |
| |||
9 | 9 | | |
10 | 10 | | |
11 | 11 | | |
12 | | - | |
| 12 | + | |
13 | 13 | | |
14 | 14 | | |
15 | 15 | | |
16 | 16 | | |
17 | 17 | | |
18 | 18 | | |
19 | 19 | | |
20 | | - | |
| 20 | + | |
21 | 21 | | |
22 | 22 | | |
23 | 23 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments