Skip to content
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> ConstraintConversion<'a, 'tcx> {
let assumptions =
elaborate::elaborate_outlives_assumptions(self.infcx.tcx, assumptions.iter().copied());

for &(constraint, constraint_category) in constraints {
for &(constraint, constraint_category, _) in constraints {
constraint.iter_outlives().for_each(|predicate| {
self.convert(predicate, constraint_category, &assumptions);
});
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> ConstraintConversion<'a, 'tcx> {
// FIXME(higher_ranked_auto): What should we do with the assumptions here?
if let Some(QueryRegionConstraints { constraints, assumptions: _ }) = constraints {
next_outlives_predicates.extend(constraints.iter().flat_map(
|(constraint, category)| {
|(constraint, category, _)| {
constraint.iter_outlives().map(|outlives| (outlives, *category))
},
));
Expand Down
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions compiler/rustc_hir_analysis/src/check/wfcheck.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -728,6 +728,7 @@ fn region_known_to_outlive<'tcx>(
SubregionOrigin::RelateRegionParamBound(DUMMY_SP, None),
region_b,
region_a,
ty::VisibleForLeakCheck::Unreachable,
);
})
}
Expand Down
7 changes: 6 additions & 1 deletion compiler/rustc_hir_analysis/src/coherence/builtin.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -496,7 +496,12 @@ pub(crate) fn coerce_unsized_info<'tcx>(
}

(&ty::Ref(r_a, ty_a, mutbl_a), &ty::Ref(r_b, ty_b, mutbl_b)) => {
infcx.sub_regions(SubregionOrigin::RelateObjectBound(span), r_b, r_a);
infcx.sub_regions(
SubregionOrigin::RelateObjectBound(span),
r_b,
r_a,
ty::VisibleForLeakCheck::Yes,
);
let mt_a = ty::TypeAndMut { ty: ty_a, mutbl: mutbl_a };
let mt_b = ty::TypeAndMut { ty: ty_b, mutbl: mutbl_b };
check_mutbl(mt_a, mt_b, &|ty| Ty::new_imm_ref(tcx, r_b, ty))
Expand Down
28 changes: 17 additions & 11 deletions compiler/rustc_infer/src/infer/canonical/query_response.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -188,14 +188,14 @@ impl<'tcx> InferCtxt<'tcx> {
let InferOk { value: result_args, obligations } =
self.query_response_instantiation(cause, param_env, original_values, query_response)?;

for (constraint, _category) in &query_response.value.region_constraints.constraints {
for (constraint, _category, vis) in &query_response.value.region_constraints.constraints {
let constraint = instantiate_value(self.tcx, &result_args, *constraint);
match constraint {
ty::RegionConstraint::Outlives(predicate) => {
self.register_outlives_constraint(predicate, cause);
self.register_outlives_constraint(predicate, *vis, cause);
}
ty::RegionConstraint::Eq(predicate) => {
self.register_region_eq_constraint(predicate, cause);
self.register_region_eq_constraint(predicate, *vis, cause);
}
}
}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -288,6 +288,7 @@ impl<'tcx> InferCtxt<'tcx> {
output_query_region_constraints.constraints.push((
ty::RegionEqPredicate(v_o.into(), v_r).into(),
constraint_category,
ty::VisibleForLeakCheck::Yes,
));
}
}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -586,6 +587,7 @@ impl<'tcx> InferCtxt<'tcx> {
SubregionOrigin::RelateRegionParamBound(cause.span, None),
v1,
v2,
ty::VisibleForLeakCheck::Yes,
);
}
(GenericArgKind::Const(v1), GenericArgKind::Const(v2)) => {
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -623,20 +625,24 @@ pub fn make_query_region_constraints<'tcx>(
| ConstraintKind::RegSubReg => {
// Swap regions because we are going from sub (<=) to outlives (>=).
let constraint = ty::OutlivesPredicate(c.sup.into(), c.sub).into();
(constraint, origin.to_constraint_category())
(constraint, origin.to_constraint_category(), c.visible_for_leak_check)
}

ConstraintKind::VarEqVar | ConstraintKind::VarEqReg | ConstraintKind::RegEqReg => {
let constraint = ty::RegionEqPredicate(c.sup, c.sub).into();
(constraint, origin.to_constraint_category())
(constraint, origin.to_constraint_category(), c.visible_for_leak_check)
}
})
.chain(outlives_obligations.into_iter().map(|obl| {
(
ty::OutlivesPredicate(obl.sup_type.into(), obl.sub_region).into(),
obl.origin.to_constraint_category(),
)
}))
.chain(outlives_obligations.into_iter().map(
|TypeOutlivesConstraint { sub_region, sup_type, origin }| {
(
ty::OutlivesPredicate(sup_type.into(), sub_region).into(),
origin.to_constraint_category(),
// We don't do leak checks for type outlives
ty::VisibleForLeakCheck::Unreachable,
)
},
))
.collect();

QueryRegionConstraints { constraints, assumptions }
Expand Down
18 changes: 16 additions & 2 deletions compiler/rustc_infer/src/infer/context.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -256,19 +256,33 @@ impl<'tcx> rustc_type_ir::InferCtxtLike for InferCtxt<'tcx> {
self.probe(|_| probe())
}

fn sub_regions(&self, sub: ty::Region<'tcx>, sup: ty::Region<'tcx>, span: Span) {
fn sub_regions(
&self,
sub: ty::Region<'tcx>,
sup: ty::Region<'tcx>,
vis: ty::VisibleForLeakCheck,
span: Span,
) {
self.inner.borrow_mut().unwrap_region_constraints().make_subregion(
SubregionOrigin::RelateRegionParamBound(span, None),
sub,
sup,
vis,
);
}

fn equate_regions(&self, a: ty::Region<'tcx>, b: ty::Region<'tcx>, span: Span) {
fn equate_regions(
&self,
a: ty::Region<'tcx>,
b: ty::Region<'tcx>,
vis: ty::VisibleForLeakCheck,
span: Span,
) {
self.inner.borrow_mut().unwrap_region_constraints().make_eqregion(
SubregionOrigin::RelateRegionParamBound(span, None),
a,
b,
vis,
);
}

Expand Down
6 changes: 5 additions & 1 deletion compiler/rustc_infer/src/infer/lexical_region_resolve/mod.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -149,7 +149,11 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> LexicalResolver<'cx, 'tcx> {

// Deduplicating constraints is shown to have a positive perf impact.
let mut seen = UnordSet::default();
self.data.constraints.retain(|(constraint, _)| seen.insert(*constraint));
self.data.constraints.retain_mut(|(constraint, _)| {
// We don't want to discern constraints by leak check visibility here
constraint.visible_for_leak_check = ty::VisibleForLeakCheck::Unreachable;
seen.insert(*constraint)
});

if cfg!(debug_assertions) {
self.dump_constraints();
Expand Down
6 changes: 4 additions & 2 deletions compiler/rustc_infer/src/infer/mod.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -698,8 +698,9 @@ impl<'tcx> InferCtxt<'tcx> {
origin: SubregionOrigin<'tcx>,
a: ty::Region<'tcx>,
b: ty::Region<'tcx>,
vis: ty::VisibleForLeakCheck,
) {
self.inner.borrow_mut().unwrap_region_constraints().make_subregion(origin, a, b);
self.inner.borrow_mut().unwrap_region_constraints().make_subregion(origin, a, b, vis);
}

#[instrument(skip(self), level = "debug")]
Expand All @@ -708,8 +709,9 @@ impl<'tcx> InferCtxt<'tcx> {
origin: SubregionOrigin<'tcx>,
a: ty::Region<'tcx>,
b: ty::Region<'tcx>,
vis: ty::VisibleForLeakCheck,
) {
self.inner.borrow_mut().unwrap_region_constraints().make_eqregion(origin, a, b);
self.inner.borrow_mut().unwrap_region_constraints().make_eqregion(origin, a, b, vis);
}

/// Processes a `Coerce` predicate from the fulfillment context.
Expand Down
12 changes: 8 additions & 4 deletions compiler/rustc_infer/src/infer/outlives/obligations.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -85,11 +85,12 @@ impl<'tcx> InferCtxt<'tcx> {
pub fn register_outlives_constraint(
&self,
ty::OutlivesPredicate(arg, r2): ty::ArgOutlivesPredicate<'tcx>,
vis: ty::VisibleForLeakCheck,
cause: &ObligationCause<'tcx>,
) {
match arg.kind() {
ty::GenericArgKind::Lifetime(r1) => {
self.register_region_outlives_constraint(ty::OutlivesPredicate(r1, r2), cause);
self.register_region_outlives_constraint(ty::OutlivesPredicate(r1, r2), vis, cause);
}
ty::GenericArgKind::Type(ty1) => {
self.register_type_outlives_constraint(ty1, r2, cause);
Expand All @@ -101,24 +102,26 @@ impl<'tcx> InferCtxt<'tcx> {
pub fn register_region_eq_constraint(
&self,
ty::RegionEqPredicate(r_a, r_b): ty::RegionEqPredicate<'tcx>,
vis: ty::VisibleForLeakCheck,
cause: &ObligationCause<'tcx>,
) {
let origin = SubregionOrigin::from_obligation_cause(cause, || {
SubregionOrigin::RelateRegionParamBound(cause.span, None)
});
self.equate_regions(origin, r_a, r_b);
self.equate_regions(origin, r_a, r_b, vis);
}

pub fn register_region_outlives_constraint(
&self,
ty::OutlivesPredicate(r_a, r_b): ty::RegionOutlivesPredicate<'tcx>,
vis: ty::VisibleForLeakCheck,
cause: &ObligationCause<'tcx>,
) {
let origin = SubregionOrigin::from_obligation_cause(cause, || {
SubregionOrigin::RelateRegionParamBound(cause.span, None)
});
// `'a: 'b` ==> `'b <= 'a`
self.sub_regions(origin, r_b, r_a);
self.sub_regions(origin, r_b, r_a, vis);
}

/// Registers that the given region obligation must be resolved
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -577,7 +580,8 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> TypeOutlivesDelegate<'tcx> for &'cx InferCtxt<'tcx> {
b: ty::Region<'tcx>,
_constraint_category: ConstraintCategory<'tcx>,
) {
self.sub_regions(origin, a, b)
// We don't do leak check in borrowck
self.sub_regions(origin, a, b, ty::VisibleForLeakCheck::Unreachable)
}

fn push_verify(
Expand Down
21 changes: 16 additions & 5 deletions compiler/rustc_infer/src/infer/region_constraints/leak_check.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -392,10 +392,15 @@ impl<'tcx> MiniGraph<'tcx> {
{
match undo_entry {
&AddConstraint(i) => {
region_constraints.data().constraints[i]
.0
.iter_outlives()
.for_each(|c| each_edge(c.sub, c.sup));
region_constraints.data().constraints[i].0.iter_outlives().for_each(
|Constraint { kind: _, sub, sup, visible_for_leak_check }| {
match visible_for_leak_check {
ty::VisibleForLeakCheck::Yes => each_edge(sub, sup),
ty::VisibleForLeakCheck::No => {}
ty::VisibleForLeakCheck::Unreachable => unreachable!(),
}
},
);
}
&AddVerify(i) => span_bug!(
region_constraints.data().verifys[i].origin.span(),
Expand All @@ -410,7 +415,13 @@ impl<'tcx> MiniGraph<'tcx> {
.constraints
.iter()
.flat_map(|(c, _)| c.iter_outlives())
.for_each(|c| each_edge(c.sub, c.sup))
.for_each(|Constraint { kind: _, sub, sup, visible_for_leak_check }| {
match visible_for_leak_check {
ty::VisibleForLeakCheck::Yes => each_edge(sub, sup),
ty::VisibleForLeakCheck::No => {}
ty::VisibleForLeakCheck::Unreachable => unreachable!(),
}
})
}
}

Expand Down
Loading
Loading