You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: docs/concepts/comparison.md
+1-1Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ description: "Comparison of RustFS with mainstream object storage products"
17
17
| License Friendliness | Medium | Poor | Excellent |
18
18
| Performance | Performance depends on hardware and configuration | High performance, low latency, suitable for high-speed read/write and large-scale object access | High performance, low latency, suitable for high-speed read/write and large-scale object access |
19
19
| File Protocol | Supports S3, RBD, CephFS and other protocols | S3 | S3 |
20
-
| Ease of Use |High|Low|Low|
20
+
| Ease of Use |Low|High|High|
21
21
| Scalability | EB level | EB level | EB level |
22
22
| Hardware Requirements | High hardware resource consumption | Medium resource consumption, medium hardware requirements | Low resource consumption, lower hardware requirements |
23
23
| Memory Stability | Stable | High jitter under high concurrency | Stable |
0 commit comments