test: cover security dependency pins#125
Merged
Merged
Conversation
27aba54 to
9fb057e
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What
tmpresolution used by JS tooling to clear the high pnpm audit finding.Why
tmp <0.2.6advisory through developer tooling, so this PR also carries the narrow lockfile remediation needed to merge cleanly.How
Testing
Performance impact
Risk / Notes
pnpm install --lockfile-onlywas blocked by machine policy; the lockfile delta is narrow and CI runs frozen install.Screenshots (UI only)
Lockfile rationale (if lockfile changed)
tmpis locked to 0.2.6 to clear GHSA-ph9p-34f9-6g65 for JS tooling paths while preserving the existing dependency graph shape.