Dogfood proof-pr v0.2.4 metadata evidence#103
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: ddb091039b
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| receipt_path: proof-pr.json | ||
| proof_pr_ref: v0.2.3 | ||
| proof_pr_ref: v0.2.4 | ||
| check_public_git_metadata: true |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use noreply metadata before enabling the gate
When this manual proof workflow is run for this PR branch, the newly enabled public-metadata check scans the introduced range and rejects author/committer emails that are not GitHub noreply addresses. This commit itself has both author and committer set to Codex <codex@openai.com> (git log 6799a4d^..6799a4d --format=...), so the v0.2.4 gate will fail on the change that added it, and the receipt's findings=0 evidence is already stale. Amend/regenerate the commit with noreply metadata or leave the gate disabled until the introduced range is clean.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
Summary
public-git-metadataevidence to the committed proof receiptVerification
proof-pr collect-public-git-metadatagenerated the receipt evidence