Pin proof-pr v0.2.8 dogfood guidance#108
Conversation
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 3e2f4ce9ce
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| --check public-git-metadata \ | ||
| --fix-only |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This example still initializes the temporary receipt with --tier T1, but the new --check public-git-metadata --fix-only command only works when that hygiene finding exists. I checked proof-pr v0.2.8's CLI semantics: cmd_receipt_hygiene filters to the requested check and exits 2 when no finding matches, while _receipt_hygiene_findings only emits public-git-metadata for tier T3 or higher. As written, readers who copy the documented local check will get receipt hygiene: no finding for check public-git-metadata instead of the promised copyable remediation, so the example should either use a T3 tier or avoid focusing on that check.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
1 participant
Summary
--explain --check public-git-metadata --fix-onlyProof
Risk
Low: workflow pin and docs-only author guidance. Reusable workflow remains advisory/read-only by default.
Rollback
Revert this PR to pin back to v0.2.7 and restore the broader
--explainexample.