|
3 | 3 | ◊define-meta[page-title]{Development plans, zoning, and public hearings in Vancouver} |
4 | 4 | ◊define-meta[short-title]{Public hearings in Vancouver} |
5 | 5 | ◊define-meta[original-date]{2021-05-31} |
| 6 | +◊define-meta[edited-date]{2023-10-20} |
6 | 7 | ◊define-meta[snippet]{Why Vancouver Council can't avoid public hearings for rezonings like other municipalities can} |
7 | 8 |
|
8 | 9 | ◊declare-work[#:id "Scenescapes" #:type "book" #:author-given "Daniel |
@@ -57,6 +58,21 @@ Pacific Railway Co v Vancouver (City)" #:citation "2004 BCCA 192" |
57 | 58 | ◊declare-work[#:id "MAA" #:type "statute" #:title "Municipal Amendment |
58 | 59 | Act, 1985" #:volume "SBC" #:year "1985" #:chapter "79"] |
59 | 60 |
|
| 61 | +◊declare-work[#:id "MASA2" #:type "statute" #:title "Municipal Affairs |
| 62 | +Statutes Amendment Act (No. 2)" #:volume "SBC" #:year "2021" #:chapter |
| 63 | +"30" #:url |
| 64 | +"https://www.bclaws.gov.bc.ca/civix/document/id/hstats/hstats/100630976"] |
| 65 | +
|
| 66 | +◊margin-note{I updated this article in October 2023, to reflect the |
| 67 | +◊cite["MASA2"], which made the public hearing requirement even |
| 68 | +◊em{less} onerous for municipalities other than Vancouver. Prior to |
| 69 | +this amendment, municipalities other than Vancouver could ◊em{waive} |
| 70 | +public hearings for propozed rezoning bylaws where the rezoning was |
| 71 | +consistent with an existing official community plan. Now, |
| 72 | +municipalities other than Vancouver simply ◊em{are not required} to |
| 73 | +hold such a hearing; there is no need for council to expressly waive |
| 74 | +the requirement.} |
| 75 | +
|
60 | 76 | Vancouver has several ◊em{[official development |
61 | 77 | plans](https://vancouver.ca/home-property-development/zoning-and-land-use-policies-document-library.aspx#regulation-development-plans)} |
62 | 78 | (ODPs). These plans limit the uses that are allowed in certain |
|
0 commit comments