Skip to content

chore(devdeps): update dependency oxlint to v1.66.0#6467

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
renovate/oxlint-monorepo
Open

chore(devdeps): update dependency oxlint to v1.66.0#6467
renovate[bot] wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
renovate/oxlint-monorepo

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@renovate renovate Bot commented May 23, 2026

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
oxlint (source) 1.64.01.66.0 age confidence

Release Notes

oxc-project/oxc (oxlint)

v1.66.0

Compare Source

🚀 Features
  • 0440b0f linter/eslint: Implement id-match rule (#​22379) (Vladislav Sayapin)
  • 65bf119 linter: Implement react no-object-type-as-default-prop (#​22481) (uhyo)
  • 2a6ddce linter/eslint: Implement no-implied-eval rule (#​22391) (Vladislav Sayapin)
  • 625758a linter/vitest: Implement padding-around-after-all-blocks rule (#​21788) (kapobajza)
  • 37680b0 linter: Implement react no-unstable-nested-components (#​22248) (Jovi De Croock)
  • d8d9c74 linter: Implement import/newline-after-import rule (#​19142) (Ryuya Yanagi)

v1.65.0

Compare Source

🚀 Features
  • 5478fb5 linter/jsdoc: Implement require-throws-description rule (#​22386) (Mikhail Baev)
  • c73225e linter/eslint: Implement prefer-arrow-callback rule (#​22312) (박천(Cheon Park))
  • de82b59 linter: Add support for eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y-x (#​22356) (mehm8128)
  • f44b6c8 linter: Fill schemas DummyRuleMap with built-in rules (#​22288) (Sysix)

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • Only on Sunday and Saturday (* * * * 0,6)
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate Bot added the dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label May 23, 2026
@renovate renovate Bot requested review from a team, jsulpis and lisalupi as code owners May 23, 2026 05:32
@renovate renovate Bot requested a review from a team May 23, 2026 05:32
@changeset-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

changeset-bot Bot commented May 23, 2026

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 17c6164

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented May 23, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 92.38%. Comparing base (1fee117) to head (52ece54).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #6467      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   92.35%   92.38%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         519      525       +6     
  Lines        9196     9271      +75     
  Branches     3440     3433       -7     
==========================================
+ Hits         8493     8565      +72     
- Misses        703      706       +3     

see 6 files with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1fee117...52ece54. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@philibea philibea force-pushed the renovate/oxlint-monorepo branch from 52ece54 to 17c6164 Compare May 25, 2026 22:18
@renovate
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

renovate Bot commented May 25, 2026

Edited/Blocked Notification

Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above.

⚠️ Warning: custom changes will be lost.

{label || labelInformation ? (
<Label htmlFor={localId} labelDescription={labelInformation} required={required} size={size}>
{hasLabel ? (
<Label id={labelId} htmlFor={localId} labelDescription={labelInformation} required={required} size={size}>
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it's already linked to the input via htmlFor 🤔 idem in the test of the Label component.

It seems that the rule jsx-a11y/control-has-associated-label ignores the input element by default, maybe this was overridden by the array ["tr", "td"] in the config ?

I guess we can add input in the ignoreElements list and revert this file and the test of the Label (or maybe just keep the aria-label)

Image

Comment thread .oxlintrc.jsonc
"react/no-multi-comp": "off",
"react/no-array-index-key": "off",
"react/only-export-components": "off",
"react/no-unstable-nested-components": "off",
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do we have many nested components ?

Comment thread .oxlintrc.jsonc
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
"rules": {
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Better to warn than disable rules

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants