Skip to content

Bump arsenal and update supportedLifecycleRules#5804

Merged
bert-e merged 2 commits intodevelopment/9.0from
improvement/CLDSRV-651
May 26, 2025
Merged

Bump arsenal and update supportedLifecycleRules#5804
bert-e merged 2 commits intodevelopment/9.0from
improvement/CLDSRV-651

Conversation

@francoisferrand
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

  • Bump arsenal 8.2.16
  • Upgrade supportedLifecycleRules definition

Issue: CLDSRV-651

@bert-e
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

bert-e commented May 20, 2025

Hello francoisferrand,

My role is to assist you with the merge of this
pull request. Please type @bert-e help to get information
on this process, or consult the user documentation.

Available options
name description privileged authored
/after_pull_request Wait for the given pull request id to be merged before continuing with the current one.
/bypass_author_approval Bypass the pull request author's approval
/bypass_build_status Bypass the build and test status
/bypass_commit_size Bypass the check on the size of the changeset TBA
/bypass_incompatible_branch Bypass the check on the source branch prefix
/bypass_jira_check Bypass the Jira issue check
/bypass_peer_approval Bypass the pull request peers' approval
/bypass_leader_approval Bypass the pull request leaders' approval
/approve Instruct Bert-E that the author has approved the pull request. ✍️
/create_pull_requests Allow the creation of integration pull requests.
/create_integration_branches Allow the creation of integration branches.
/no_octopus Prevent Wall-E from doing any octopus merge and use multiple consecutive merge instead
/unanimity Change review acceptance criteria from one reviewer at least to all reviewers
/wait Instruct Bert-E not to run until further notice.
Available commands
name description privileged
/help Print Bert-E's manual in the pull request.
/status Print Bert-E's current status in the pull request TBA
/clear Remove all comments from Bert-E from the history TBA
/retry Re-start a fresh build TBA
/build Re-start a fresh build TBA
/force_reset Delete integration branches & pull requests, and restart merge process from the beginning.
/reset Try to remove integration branches unless there are commits on them which do not appear on the source branch.

Status report is not available.

@bert-e
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

bert-e commented May 20, 2025

Request integration branches

Waiting for integration branch creation to be requested by the user.

To request integration branches, please comment on this pull request with the following command:

/create_integration_branches

Alternatively, the /approve and /create_pull_requests commands will automatically
create the integration branches.

Use the values and "format" defined in arsenal, i.e. the names from S3.
This simplifies code and avoids duplication.

Issue: CLDSRV-651
@francoisferrand francoisferrand force-pushed the improvement/CLDSRV-651 branch from f564fee to 0d150e9 Compare May 26, 2025 07:08
@francoisferrand
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/approve

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented May 26, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 75.62%. Comparing base (dee5d54) to head (0d150e9).
Report is 2 commits behind head on development/9.0.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
lib/Config.js 77.21% <100.00%> (+0.02%) ⬆️
@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##           development/9.0    #5804   +/-   ##
================================================
  Coverage            75.62%   75.62%           
================================================
  Files                  188      188           
  Lines                11948    11949    +1     
================================================
+ Hits                  9036     9037    +1     
  Misses                2912     2912           
Flag Coverage Δ
ceph-backend-test 46.87% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
file-ft-tests 47.25% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
kmip-ft-tests 26.75% <100.00%> (+0.03%) ⬆️
mongo-v0-ft-tests 47.68% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
mongo-v1-ft-tests 47.70% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
multiple-backend 35.40% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
quota-tests 33.03% <100.00%> (+0.90%) ⬆️
quota-tests-inflights 34.11% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
unit 65.64% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
utapi-v2-tests 33.22% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@bert-e
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

bert-e commented May 26, 2025

Integration data created

I have created the integration data for the additional destination branches.

The following branches will NOT be impacted:

  • development/7.10
  • development/7.4
  • development/7.70
  • development/8.8

You can set option create_pull_requests if you need me to create
integration pull requests in addition to integration branches, with:

@bert-e create_pull_requests

The following options are set: approve

@bert-e
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

bert-e commented May 26, 2025

Build failed

The build for commit did not succeed in branch improvement/CLDSRV-651

The following options are set: approve

@bert-e bert-e merged commit 0d150e9 into development/9.0 May 26, 2025
30 of 34 checks passed
@bert-e
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

bert-e commented May 26, 2025

I have successfully merged the changeset of this pull request
into targetted development branches:

  • ✔️ development/9.0

  • ✔️ development/9.1

The following branches have NOT changed:

  • development/7.10
  • development/7.4
  • development/7.70
  • development/8.8

Please check the status of the associated issue CLDSRV-651.

Goodbye francoisferrand.

The following options are set: approve

@bert-e bert-e deleted the improvement/CLDSRV-651 branch May 26, 2025 07:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants