Introduce "internal" cloudserver and allow bypass policies on that port

[francoisferrand]

In order to ensure backbeat (and internal processes in general) are not affected by user's bucket policies, allow starting cloudserver with a separate "internal" port, through which bucket policies are currently bypassed.

More details here: https://scality.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/OS/pages/2895347722/Authorizing+Internal+Services+S3+Operations

Issue: CLDSRV-650

[bert-e]

Hello francoisferrand,

My role is to assist you with the merge of this
pull request. Please type @bert-e help to get information
on this process, or consult the user documentation.

Available options

name	description	privileged	authored
/after_pull_request	Wait for the given pull request id to be merged before continuing with the current one.
/bypass_author_approval	Bypass the pull request author's approval	⭐
/bypass_build_status	Bypass the build and test status	⭐
/bypass_commit_size	Bypass the check on the size of the changeset TBA	⭐
/bypass_incompatible_branch	Bypass the check on the source branch prefix	⭐
/bypass_jira_check	Bypass the Jira issue check	⭐
/bypass_peer_approval	Bypass the pull request peers' approval	⭐
/bypass_leader_approval	Bypass the pull request leaders' approval	⭐
/approve	Instruct Bert-E that the author has approved the pull request.		✍️
/create_pull_requests	Allow the creation of integration pull requests.
/create_integration_branches	Allow the creation of integration branches.
/no_octopus	Prevent Wall-E from doing any octopus merge and use multiple consecutive merge instead
/unanimity	Change review acceptance criteria from one reviewer at least to all reviewers
/wait	Instruct Bert-E not to run until further notice.

Available commands

name	description	privileged
/help	Print Bert-E's manual in the pull request.
/status	Print Bert-E's current status in the pull request TBA
/clear	Remove all comments from Bert-E from the history TBA
/retry	Re-start a fresh build TBA
/build	Re-start a fresh build TBA
/force_reset	Delete integration branches & pull requests, and restart merge process from the beginning.
/reset	Try to remove integration branches unless there are commits on them which do not appear on the source branch.

Status report is not available.

[ghost]

lgtm!

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 96.42857% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 75.76%. Comparing base (0d150e9) to head (6d0c57c).
Report is 3 commits behind head on development/9.0.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
lib/server.js	95.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
lib/Config.js	78.06% <100.00%> (+0.85%)	⬆️
lib/api/apiUtils/authorization/permissionChecks.js	87.68% <100.00%> (ø)
lib/server.js	78.08% <95.00%> (+4.12%)	⬆️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##           development/9.0    #5807      +/-   ##
===================================================
+ Coverage            75.62%   75.76%   +0.13%     
===================================================
  Files                  188      188              
  Lines                11949    11963      +14     
===================================================
+ Hits                  9037     9064      +27     
+ Misses                2912     2899      -13     

Flag	Coverage Δ
ceph-backend-test	46.88% <67.85%> (+0.01%)	⬆️
file-ft-tests	47.26% <64.28%> (+0.01%)	⬆️
kmip-ft-tests	26.75% <64.28%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
mongo-v0-ft-tests	47.69% <64.28%> (+0.01%)	⬆️
mongo-v1-ft-tests	47.71% <64.28%> (+0.01%)	⬆️
multiple-backend	35.42% <67.85%> (+0.02%)	⬆️
quota-tests	32.15% <64.28%> (-0.88%)	⬇️
quota-tests-inflights	34.14% <64.28%> (+0.03%)	⬆️
unit	66.78% <89.28%> (+1.14%)	⬆️
utapi-v2-tests	33.25% <64.28%> (+0.02%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[bert-e]

Request integration branches

Waiting for integration branch creation to be requested by the user.

To request integration branches, please comment on this pull request with the following command:

/create_integration_branches

Alternatively, the /approve and /create_pull_requests commands will automatically
create the integration branches.

[francoisferrand]

/approve

[bert-e]

Build failed

The build for commit did not succeed in branch w/9.1/improvement/CLDSRV-650

The following options are set: approve

[bert-e]

I have successfully merged the changeset of this pull request
into targetted development branches:

• ✔️ development/9.0

• ✔️ development/9.1

The following branches have NOT changed:

• development/7.10
• development/7.4
• development/7.70
• development/8.8

Please check the status of the associated issue CLDSRV-650.

Goodbye francoisferrand.

The following options are set: approve