Skip to content

CLDSRV-672: restore GHAS with proper actions trigger#5848

Merged
bert-e merged 1 commit intodevelopment/9.0from
feature/CLDSRV-672-restore-ghas
Jun 27, 2025
Merged

CLDSRV-672: restore GHAS with proper actions trigger#5848
bert-e merged 1 commit intodevelopment/9.0from
feature/CLDSRV-672-restore-ghas

Conversation

@tcarmet
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@tcarmet tcarmet commented Jun 25, 2025

Latest modification on the GitHub actions trigger stopped making the static security analysis made by codeql available on the security page.

This PR aims to restore it.

Also removing the trigger on stabilization branch since there's none on cloudserver, and there's no big use on the other branches as well, but they can arguably be added back if needed.

@bert-e
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

bert-e commented Jun 25, 2025

Hello tcarmet,

My role is to assist you with the merge of this
pull request. Please type @bert-e help to get information
on this process, or consult the user documentation.

Available options
name description privileged authored
/after_pull_request Wait for the given pull request id to be merged before continuing with the current one.
/bypass_author_approval Bypass the pull request author's approval
/bypass_build_status Bypass the build and test status
/bypass_commit_size Bypass the check on the size of the changeset TBA
/bypass_incompatible_branch Bypass the check on the source branch prefix
/bypass_jira_check Bypass the Jira issue check
/bypass_peer_approval Bypass the pull request peers' approval
/bypass_leader_approval Bypass the pull request leaders' approval
/approve Instruct Bert-E that the author has approved the pull request. ✍️
/create_pull_requests Allow the creation of integration pull requests.
/create_integration_branches Allow the creation of integration branches.
/no_octopus Prevent Wall-E from doing any octopus merge and use multiple consecutive merge instead
/unanimity Change review acceptance criteria from one reviewer at least to all reviewers
/wait Instruct Bert-E not to run until further notice.
Available commands
name description privileged
/help Print Bert-E's manual in the pull request.
/status Print Bert-E's current status in the pull request TBA
/clear Remove all comments from Bert-E from the history TBA
/retry Re-start a fresh build TBA
/build Re-start a fresh build TBA
/force_reset Delete integration branches & pull requests, and restart merge process from the beginning.
/reset Try to remove integration branches unless there are commits on them which do not appear on the source branch.

Status report is not available.

@bert-e
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

bert-e commented Jun 25, 2025

Incorrect fix version

The Fix Version/s in issue CLDSRV-672 contains:

  • None

Considering where you are trying to merge, I ignored possible hotfix versions and I expected to find:

  • 9.0.18

  • 9.1.0

Please check the Fix Version/s of CLDSRV-672, or the target
branch of this pull request.

@tcarmet tcarmet requested review from a team and BourgoisMickael June 25, 2025 17:50
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Jun 25, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 75.84%. Comparing base (0c09de5) to head (0811abb).

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##           development/9.0    #5848   +/-   ##
================================================
  Coverage            75.84%   75.84%           
================================================
  Files                  188      188           
  Lines                11969    11969           
================================================
  Hits                  9078     9078           
  Misses                2891     2891           
Flag Coverage Δ
ceph-backend-test 46.92% <ø> (ø)
file-ft-tests 47.30% <ø> (ø)
kmip-ft-tests 26.95% <ø> (ø)
mongo-v0-ft-tests 47.73% <ø> (ø)
mongo-v1-ft-tests 47.75% <ø> (ø)
multiple-backend 35.45% <ø> (ø)
quota-tests 33.07% <ø> (ø)
quota-tests-inflights 34.18% <ø> (ø)
unit 66.82% <ø> (ø)
utapi-v2-tests 33.30% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@bert-e
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

bert-e commented Jun 25, 2025

Request integration branches

Waiting for integration branch creation to be requested by the user.

To request integration branches, please comment on this pull request with the following command:

/create_integration_branches

Alternatively, the /approve and /create_pull_requests commands will automatically
create the integration branches.

@tcarmet tcarmet requested review from a team June 25, 2025 18:25
@tcarmet
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

tcarmet commented Jun 26, 2025

/approve

@bert-e
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

bert-e commented Jun 26, 2025

Integration data created

I have created the integration data for the additional destination branches.

The following branches will NOT be impacted:

  • development/7.10
  • development/7.4
  • development/7.70
  • development/8.8

You can set option create_pull_requests if you need me to create
integration pull requests in addition to integration branches, with:

@bert-e create_pull_requests

The following options are set: approve

@bert-e
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

bert-e commented Jun 26, 2025

In the queue

The changeset has received all authorizations and has been added to the
relevant queue(s). The queue(s) will be merged in the target development
branch(es) as soon as builds have passed.

The changeset will be merged in:

  • ✔️ development/9.0

  • ✔️ development/9.1

The following branches will NOT be impacted:

  • development/7.10
  • development/7.4
  • development/7.70
  • development/8.8

There is no action required on your side. You will be notified here once
the changeset has been merged. In the unlikely event that the changeset
fails permanently on the queue, a member of the admin team will
contact you to help resolve the matter.

IMPORTANT

Please do not attempt to modify this pull request.

  • Any commit you add on the source branch will trigger a new cycle after the
    current queue is merged.
  • Any commit you add on one of the integration branches will be lost.

If you need this pull request to be removed from the queue, please contact a
member of the admin team now.

The following options are set: approve

@bert-e
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

bert-e commented Jun 26, 2025

Queue build failed

The corresponding build for the queue failed:

  • Checkout the status page.
  • Identify the failing build and review the logs.
  • If no issue is found, re-run the build.
  • If an issue is identified, checkout the steps below to remove
    the pull request from the queue for further analysis and maybe rebase/merge.
Remove the pull request from the queue
  • Add a /wait comment on this pull request.
  • Click on login on the status page.
  • Go into the manage page.
  • Find the option called Rebuild the queue and click on it.
    Bert-E will loop again on all pull requests to put the valid ones
    in the queue again, while skipping the one with the /wait comment.
  • Wait for the new queue to merge, then merge/rebase your pull request
    with the latest changes to then work on a proper fix.
  • Once the issue is fixed, delete the /wait comment and
    follow the usual process to merge the pull request.

@BourgoisMickael
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

ping

@scality scality deleted a comment from bert-e Jun 27, 2025
@bert-e
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

bert-e commented Jun 27, 2025

I have successfully merged the changeset of this pull request
into targetted development branches:

  • ✔️ development/9.0

  • ✔️ development/9.1

The following branches have NOT changed:

  • development/7.10
  • development/7.4
  • development/7.70
  • development/8.8

Please check the status of the associated issue CLDSRV-672.

Goodbye tcarmet.

@bert-e bert-e merged commit b033564 into development/9.0 Jun 27, 2025
25 checks passed
@bert-e bert-e deleted the feature/CLDSRV-672-restore-ghas branch June 27, 2025 14:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants