always evaluate policies in backbeat routes#5917
Conversation
Hello kerkesni,My role is to assist you with the merge of this Available options
Available commands
Status report is not available. |
Incorrect fix versionThe
Considering where you are trying to merge, I ignored possible hotfix versions and I expected to find:
Please check the |
Waiting for approvalThe following approvals are needed before I can proceed with the merge:
|
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files
... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes @@ Coverage Diff @@
## development/9.1 #5917 +/- ##
===================================================
- Coverage 83.52% 83.51% -0.02%
===================================================
Files 190 190
Lines 12167 12165 -2
===================================================
- Hits 10162 10159 -3
- Misses 2005 2006 +1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
7fd90d1 to
2bf5725
Compare
|
/approve |
In the queueThe changeset has received all authorizations and has been added to the The changeset will be merged in:
The following branches will NOT be impacted:
There is no action required on your side. You will be notified here once IMPORTANT Please do not attempt to modify this pull request.
If you need this pull request to be removed from the queue, please contact a The following options are set: approve |
|
I have successfully merged the changeset of this pull request
The following branches have NOT changed:
Please check the status of the associated issue CLDSRV-731. Goodbye kerkesni. |
Internal services have the required permissions to access backbeat routes, there is no longer the need to skip policy evaluation here.
Issue: CLDSRV-731