Copy-edit paper: fix figure name, citation, abbreviations, prose - #203
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Comprehensive copy-edit pass on paper.md after several defects were spotted post-merge (the earlier review was scoped to word-count cuts, not proofreading). Driven by an exhaustive
manuscript:paper-reviewcopy-edit plus a verification of the two competitor packages against their actual repos.Substantive fixes
pyAMICA/NGname. Regeneratedmultimodel-ensemble.pngfrom the cached ensemble (no re-fitting); verified visually it now readspamicain the title, both legends, and stats boxes.@palmer2012amicahad lost its only citation (orphaned in the bib), and the Acknowledgements' "Palmer et al., cited above" pointed at the Newton-method paper instead. Now cited at AMICA's first mention and in the Acknowledgements; orphan-check confirms every bib entry is cited.amica(Esmaeili, JAX) andpyamica(Herforth, PyTorch) are both multi-model and MNE-compatible (paper's claims hold), but softened "validation beyond what either alternative publishes" to a factual statement of pamica's specific validation, since Esmaeili's package does publish MATLAB-AMICA parity and I can't verify relative depth.Grammar / abbreviations / prose
Body 1512 words, no em-dashes; Draft PDF CI validates the build.