docs: cross-link the TanStack Start comparison from the decision guide and Next.js RSC doc

docs/oss/getting-started/comparing-react-on-rails-to-alternatives.md

@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ Choose TanStack Start when you are greenfield, have no Rails investment, want a
 
 Choose React on Rails when you want a real backend — Rails — under a modern React frontend, and would rather adopt the TanStack client libraries on top of Rails than move your business logic into JavaScript.
 
-A runnable example of this architecture — React on Rails Pro with TanStack Query, Router, and Table against a Rails backend — is the [React on Rails Pro + TanStack starter](https://github.com/shakacode/react-on-rails-starter-tanstack). React Server Components require React on Rails Pro with the Node renderer.
+A runnable example of this architecture — React on Rails Pro with TanStack Query, Router, and Table against a Rails backend — is the [React on Rails Pro + TanStack starter](https://github.com/shakacode/react-on-rails-starter-tanstack). React Server Components require React on Rails Pro with the Node renderer. For a deeper architecture comparison — where each stack's server tier lives — see [React on Rails Pro and TanStack Start: Two Ways to Own the Full Stack](../../pro/react-server-components/tanstack-start-comparison.md).
 
 Official docs:
 

docs/pro/react-server-components/nextjs-comparison.md

@@ -254,3 +254,4 @@ chunk-loading primitives differ.
 - [Rspack Compatibility](./rspack-compatibility.md) — bundler support status and the native `RSCRspackPlugin`
 - [RSC Glossary](./glossary.md) — terminology reference
 - [RSC overview](./index.md) — the full React Server Components documentation set
+- [React on Rails Pro and TanStack Start](./tanstack-start-comparison.md) — the same kind of architecture comparison, for TanStack Start

llms-full-pro.txt

@@ -9440,6 +9440,7 @@ chunk-loading primitives differ.
 - [Rspack Compatibility](./rspack-compatibility.md) — bundler support status and the native `RSCRspackPlugin`
 - [RSC Glossary](./glossary.md) — terminology reference
 - [RSC overview](./index.md) — the full React Server Components documentation set
+- [React on Rails Pro and TanStack Start](./tanstack-start-comparison.md) — the same kind of architecture comparison, for TanStack Start
 
 ================================================================================
 PAGE: https://reactonrails.com/docs/pro/react-server-components/tanstack-start-comparison

llms-full.txt

@@ -2067,7 +2067,7 @@ Choose TanStack Start when you are greenfield, have no Rails investment, want a
 
 Choose React on Rails when you want a real backend — Rails — under a modern React frontend, and would rather adopt the TanStack client libraries on top of Rails than move your business logic into JavaScript.
 
-A runnable example of this architecture — React on Rails Pro with TanStack Query, Router, and Table against a Rails backend — is the [React on Rails Pro + TanStack starter](https://github.com/shakacode/react-on-rails-starter-tanstack). React Server Components require React on Rails Pro with the Node renderer.
+A runnable example of this architecture — React on Rails Pro with TanStack Query, Router, and Table against a Rails backend — is the [React on Rails Pro + TanStack starter](https://github.com/shakacode/react-on-rails-starter-tanstack). React Server Components require React on Rails Pro with the Node renderer. For a deeper architecture comparison — where each stack's server tier lives — see [React on Rails Pro and TanStack Start: Two Ways to Own the Full Stack](../../pro/react-server-components/tanstack-start-comparison.md).
 
 Official docs: