Update sponsors

Author: RobbieTheWagner

db/data/people-per-episode.ts

@@ -3,6 +3,11 @@ import people from './people';
 type PersonId = (typeof people)[number]['id'];
 
 export default {
+  // 230
+  'we-accidentally-deleted-programming-presented-by-coderabbit': [
+    { id: 'robbiethewagner' },
+    { id: 'argyleink' }
+  ],
   // 229
   'is-ai-just-stealing-with-extra-steps-presented-by-coderabbit': [
     { id: 'robbiethewagner' },

db/data/sponsors-per-episode.ts

@@ -1,4 +1,8 @@
 export default {
+  // 230
+  'we-accidentally-deleted-programming-presented-by-coderabbit': [
+    { id: 'code-rabbit' }
+  ],
   // 229
   'is-ai-just-stealing-with-extra-steps-presented-by-coderabbit': [
     { id: 'code-rabbit' }

src/content/transcripts/228.md

@@ -9,14 +9,14 @@ Whiskey Web and Whatnot. Do not adjust your set.
 
 [00:00:36] Whiskey web and whatnot is brought to you by.
 
-[00:00:41] Code reviews are critical, but time consuming code Rabbit acts as
-your AI co-pilot providing instant code review comments and potential impacts of
-every pull request beyond just flagging issues. Code Rabbit provides one click
+[00:00:41] Code reviews are critical, but time consuming CodeRabbit acts as your
+AI co-pilot providing instant code review comments and potential impacts of
+every pull request beyond just flagging issues. CodeRabbit provides one click
 fix suggestions and lets you define custom code quality rules. Using A ST GRE
 patterns, this catches subtle issues that [00:01:00] traditional static analysis
 tools might miss.
 
-[00:01:02] Code Rabbit is the category defining platform for AI code reviews.
+[00:01:02] CodeRabbit is the category defining platform for AI code reviews.
 Built for modern engineering teams navigating the rise of AI generated
 development code Rapids context aware reviews, pulling dozens of points of
 context, making them the most comprehensive AI code reviews with customization
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ features that allow you to tailor your review to your code base.
 [00:01:20] Code Rapids comments and proof with time and interactions. Code
 Rabbit helps organizations catch bugs, strengthen security, and ship reliable
 code at Speed Trust by thousands of companies in open source projects worldwide.
-Code Rabbit helps reduce review time and bugs by 50%.
+CodeRabbit helps reduce review time and bugs by 50%.
 
 [00:01:36] **Robbie Wagner:** Up on the rooftop reindeer paw, or, I was already
 wrong on that. Anyway,

src/content/transcripts/229.md

@@ -12,15 +12,15 @@ Whiskey Web and Whatnot. Do not adjust your set.
 [00:00:41] **Adam Argyle:** As more and more code is generated, developers end
 up spending more time reading and reviewing code. This creates an issue on
 reliably shipping quality code. So even though AI is promising, a lack of proper
-guardrails can slow down teams. Code Rabbit is an AI code reviewer. Unlike AI
+guardrails can slow down teams. CodeRabbit is an AI code reviewer. Unlike AI
 code generators like Cursor, windsurf, or GitHub copilot it reasons and submits
 feedback [00:01:00] on your code base while you raise a pull request to merge
 code into your VCS code.
 
 [00:01:03] **Adam Argyle:** Rabbit is a self-improving agent and it learns from
-your interactions and creates learnings. Code Rabbit generates one click commit.
+your interactions and creates learnings. CodeRabbit generates one click commit.
 Suggestions for some review comments, making it easy for developers to address.
-Review comments. Code Rabbit is used by 100,000 open source projects like you
+Review comments. CodeRabbit is used by 100,000 open source projects like you
 next Js, and it's installed on 2 million repositories so far.
 
 [00:01:21] **Adam Argyle:** It's also performed more than 15 million PR reviews.
@@ -436,7 +436,7 @@ basically anything I ask it to these days.
 because I know what's better. So like, I think. Like, I was doing stuff with
 Ember data today and I'm like, I know that this thing isn't gonna work with it
 the way you did it. So like, having that human that knows to check you and be
-like, now maybe that could be Code Rabbit or like some other, you know, AI
+like, now maybe that could be CodeRabbit or like some other, you know, AI
 reviewer and maybe there is no human, but I think like, as long as they're the
 developer salaries are not hindering you're like making money, then why wouldn't
 you just keep them, like, keep the status quo?