Ideas from debian#125
Conversation
|
Hi @asarhaddon . I reviewed the commits and while some changes seem like steps forward, I dislike:
|
|
Hello.
I think GCC_UNUSED increases the complexity for no benefit here.
I have removed this part, except the VERSION stuff that seems more simple and robust.
What you are referring to is not obvious for me. My motivations were:
I do not understand. I can merge the 4 Pratchett quotes if that is what you mean (or forward the question to the author :-). |
|
I have moved more trivial commits down in the sequence in order to make a partial merge fast-forward. The introduction of components cannot be applied before the replacement of INSTALL_RENAME_MAN. What should change further ? |
|
@asarhaddon : hi. I find dealing with a 14-commits-pullreq overwhelming. Can you prepare a single-purpose pullreq? |
Hello.
Here are some ideas from the Debian packaging. It expect the quote or desktop fixes to be consensual. On the other hand, the changes in the build system are only drafts in order to start discussion.