Hi,
This package is really nice and I work with particle filters a lot in my work (in the context of parameter learning).
In Linear Gaussian models, there is a parameter degeneracy which is usually resolved by setting the diffusion term in the state model to the identity matrix (Roweis, S. and Ghahramani, Z. (1999) ‘A Unifying Review of Linear Gaussian Models’, Neural Computation, 11(2), pp. 305–345. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1162/089976699300016674.).
This is supported in FPF.jl, but my problem is that I cannot specify a diffusion matrix for the observation model. I was wondering why there is such a limitation? Why not allow the user to specify the noise covariance for the observation model?
Hi,
This package is really nice and I work with particle filters a lot in my work (in the context of parameter learning).
In Linear Gaussian models, there is a parameter degeneracy which is usually resolved by setting the diffusion term in the state model to the identity matrix (Roweis, S. and Ghahramani, Z. (1999) ‘A Unifying Review of Linear Gaussian Models’, Neural Computation, 11(2), pp. 305–345. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1162/089976699300016674.).
This is supported in FPF.jl, but my problem is that I cannot specify a diffusion matrix for the observation model. I was wondering why there is such a limitation? Why not allow the user to specify the noise covariance for the observation model?