-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 221
fix: improve the error message provided by deduplicate #1996
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
MarieSacksick
wants to merge
8
commits into
skrub-data:main
Choose a base branch
from
MarieSacksick:fix_error_deduplicate
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
9c93e03
fix: improve the error message provided by deduplicate
MarieSacksick 01756e7
add changelog
MarieSacksick 1b7d11a
pre-commit
MarieSacksick f2a7d6a
run pre commits
MarieSacksick e62a174
cancel check
MarieSacksick 97ee3c2
simplify claude code to match code style of the project
MarieSacksick 3e8a327
Merge branch 'main' into fix_error_deduplicate
MarieSacksick a181fe8
Update skrub/_deduplicate.py
MarieSacksick File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm wondering if the warning is needed, we almost never use warnings in skrub 🤔
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
True that it's a bit unusual for skrub. But it seems to me that it would be nice to warn the user that no deduplication was done. And I don't want to add a systematic warning that will be ignored and will push the user to remove all warnings...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i also wouldn't add the
warnparameter. I would say either we consider that there are no duplicates to find and return the original list without warnings, or we consider it is a genuine failure and raise a (informative) exceptionThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This situation might happen regularly, and I don't want to break pipelines while deduplicate could be used to clean data "in case". I'll remove the warn parameter, but add this behavior in documentation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm fine with that solution 👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Now that I think of it, why is it a function and not a transformer? Is there a way for the user to know the clusters or not?
It looks like I can only deduplicate a whole dataset, and not fit on train and apply on a predict.