Skip to content

chore: bump Aptos plugin ref for read observability#22106

Draft
cawthorne wants to merge 8 commits intodevelopfrom
feature/aptos-read-observability-bump
Draft

chore: bump Aptos plugin ref for read observability#22106
cawthorne wants to merge 8 commits intodevelopfrom
feature/aptos-read-observability-bump

Conversation

@cawthorne
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@cawthorne cawthorne commented Apr 21, 2026

Summary

Bump the private Aptos plugin pin in plugins.private.yaml so chainlink CI exercises the Aptos read observability branch from smartcontractkit/capabilities#560.

The updated Aptos plugin ref is:

  • 8c1237cfc04530c1831a1187320bdf50bf403abb

That capabilities branch in turn depends on the Aptos view helper extraction in smartcontractkit/chainlink-common#1992.

Why

We want chainlink CI to validate the latest Aptos read capability changes end to end against the exact branch commit from capabilities#560, including the latest shared helper validation updates from chainlink-common#1992.

Validation

  • parsed plugins.private.yaml after the ref bump
  • reproduced that go list -m github.com/smartcontractkit/capabilities/chain_capabilities/aptos@8c1237cfc04530c1831a1187320bdf50bf403abb resolves successfully

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented Apr 21, 2026

✅ No conflicts with other open PRs targeting develop

@trunk-io
Copy link
Copy Markdown

trunk-io Bot commented Apr 21, 2026

Static BadgeStatic BadgeStatic BadgeStatic Badge

Failed Test Failure Summary Logs
Test_CLOSpecApprovalFlow_dynamicPriceGetter Logs ↗︎

View Full Report ↗︎Docs

@cl-sonarqube-production
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant