Skip to content

skip another CCIP flake#22145

Merged
Tofel merged 1 commit intodevelopfrom
skip-ccip-test-2
Apr 24, 2026
Merged

skip another CCIP flake#22145
Tofel merged 1 commit intodevelopfrom
skip-ccip-test-2

Conversation

@Tofel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Tofel Tofel commented Apr 23, 2026

No description provided.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

✅ No conflicts with other open PRs targeting develop

@cl-sonarqube-production
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

@trunk-io
Copy link
Copy Markdown

trunk-io Bot commented Apr 23, 2026

Static BadgeStatic BadgeStatic BadgeStatic Badge

View Full Report ↗︎Docs

@Tofel Tofel marked this pull request as ready for review April 24, 2026 06:30
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 24, 2026 06:30
@Tofel Tofel requested review from a team as code owners April 24, 2026 06:30
@Tofel Tofel added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 24, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Risk Rating: LOW

This PR skips a flaky CCIP integration test for EVM→Sui programmable token transfers using the Burn/Mint token pool, referencing the tracking ticket.

Changes:

  • Add chainlink-common/pkg/utils/tests dependency to enable standardized flaky-test skipping.
  • Mark Test_CCIPProgrammableTokenTransfer_EVM2Sui_BurnMintTokenPool as flaky via tests.SkipFlakey with a Jira link.

Merged via the queue into develop with commit ecf53e3 Apr 24, 2026
208 of 209 checks passed
@Tofel Tofel deleted the skip-ccip-test-2 branch April 24, 2026 06:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants