NO-SNOW: Add pyarrow to dev dependencies and fix no-pandas test failures

[sfc-gh-joshi]

1. Which Jira issue is this PR addressing? Make sure that there is an accompanying issue to your PR.

   Fixes SNOW-NNNNNNN

2. Fill out the following pre-review checklist:

   • I am adding a new automated test(s) to verify correctness of my new code
     • If this test skips Local Testing mode, I'm requesting review from @snowflakedb/local-testing
   • I am adding new logging messages
   • I am adding a new telemetry message
   • I am adding new credentials
   • I am adding a new dependency
   • If this is a new feature/behavior, I'm adding the Local Testing parity changes.
   • I acknowledge that I have ensured my changes to be thread-safe. Follow the link for more information: Thread-safe Developer Guidelines
   • If adding any arguments to public Snowpark APIs or creating new public Snowpark APIs, I acknowledge that I have ensured my changes include AST support. Follow the link for more information: AST Support Guidelines

3. Please describe how your code solves the related issue.

Resolves a failure in the daily job for installations without the pandas extra: https://github.com/snowflakedb/snowpark-python/actions/runs/24500387346/job/71605865416

test_dataframe_reader_file.py imports pyarrow directly, which is normally implicitly installed by installing pandas.

test_query_generator.py uses pandas to generate parquet files, and did not guard the import of the library.

Skips a failing test in TimeSeriesTesting.ipynb due to a bug with modin on pandas 2.3.3: modin-project/modin#7697. Downgrading the pandas version for the test is not an option due to pandas-dev/pandas#65213, so I've elected to skip the test instead.

[github-actions]

Thank you for your submission, we really appreciate it. Like many open-source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution. You can sign the CLA by just posting a Pull Request Comment same as the below format.

---

I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA

---

_{You can retrigger this bot by commenting recheck in this Pull Request. Posted by the CLA Assistant Lite bot.}

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 95.17%. Comparing base (7c853e1) to head (4a1f33c).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4181      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   95.42%   95.17%   -0.26%     
==========================================
  Files         171      171              
  Lines       43615    43615              
  Branches     7459     7459              
==========================================
- Hits        41620    41510     -110     
- Misses       1220     1288      +68     
- Partials      775      817      +42     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.