-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 681
chore: add resilience-test suite and remove individual test #6807
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file was deleted.
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,268 @@ | ||
| import { fakeServer, getFirstIPv4Address } from '../../acceptance/fake-server'; | ||
| import { runSnykCLI } from '../util/runSnykCLI'; | ||
| import { getAvailableServerPort } from '../util/getServerPort'; | ||
| import { Snyk } from '@snyk/error-catalog-nodejs-public'; | ||
| import { EXIT_CODES } from '../../../src/cli/exit-codes'; | ||
| import { getCliConfig, restoreCliConfig } from '../../acceptance/config-helper'; | ||
|
|
||
| jest.setTimeout(1000 * 60); | ||
|
|
||
| const TIMEOUT_SECS = 5; | ||
| const GRACE_PERIOD_SECS = 5; | ||
| const SERVER_DELAY_MS = 10000; | ||
| const FAKE_ORG = '11111111-1111-1111-1111-111111111111'; | ||
|
|
||
| // Commands that should behave consistently across all fault scenarios | ||
| const COMMANDS_UNDER_TEST = [ | ||
| 'test', | ||
| 'code test', | ||
| 'container test scratch', | ||
| 'container monitor scratch', | ||
| 'iac test', | ||
| 'secrets test', | ||
| 'monitor', | ||
| 'whoami', | ||
| 'auth 11111111-2222-3333-4444-555555555555', | ||
| 'sbom --org=11111111-1111-1111-1111-111111111111 --format=cyclonedx1.4+json', | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Before it was: Any reason for changing the org here? |
||
| 'container sbom scratch --format=cyclonedx1.4+json', | ||
| 'sbom test --experimental --file=package.json', | ||
| 'aibom test --experimental', | ||
| ]; | ||
|
|
||
| interface ScenarioContext { | ||
| server: ReturnType<typeof fakeServer>; | ||
| savedConfig?: Record<string, string>; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| interface TestResult { | ||
| code: number; | ||
| stdout: string; | ||
| duration: number; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| interface AssertionContext { | ||
| server: ReturnType<typeof fakeServer>; | ||
| result: TestResult; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| interface ResilienceScenario { | ||
| name: string; | ||
| description: string; | ||
| setup: (ctx: ScenarioContext) => void | Promise<void>; | ||
| teardown?: (ctx: ScenarioContext) => void | Promise<void>; | ||
| expectedExitCode: number; | ||
| expectedErrorCode: string; | ||
| assert?: (ctx: AssertionContext) => void; // Additional scenario-specific assertions | ||
| envOverrides?: Record<string, string>; | ||
| skip?: string[]; // Commands to skip for this scenario (not yet consistent) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const RESILIENCE_SCENARIOS: ResilienceScenario[] = [ | ||
| // Scenario 1 | ||
| { | ||
| name: 'maintenance-window', | ||
| description: 'Backend in maintenance mode (503 with error catalog)', | ||
| setup: ({ server }) => { | ||
| const maintenanceErrorRes = { | ||
| jsonapi: { version: '1.0' }, | ||
| errors: [new Snyk.MaintenanceWindowError('').toJsonApiErrorObject()], | ||
| description: 'Maintenance window', | ||
| }; | ||
| server.setGlobalResponse( | ||
| maintenanceErrorRes, | ||
| parseInt(maintenanceErrorRes.errors[0].status), | ||
| ); | ||
| }, | ||
| expectedExitCode: EXIT_CODES.EX_TEMPFAIL, | ||
| expectedErrorCode: 'SNYK-0099', | ||
| assert: ({ server }) => { | ||
| // Verify no retries (fail fast for maintenance) | ||
| // Each snyk-request-id should appear only once - duplicates indicate retries | ||
| const requests = server.getRequests(); | ||
| const requestIdCounts = new Map<string, number>(); | ||
| for (const req of requests) { | ||
| const header = req.headers?.['snyk-request-id']; | ||
| const requestId = Array.isArray(header) ? header[0] : header; | ||
| if (requestId) { | ||
| requestIdCounts.set( | ||
| requestId, | ||
| (requestIdCounts.get(requestId) ?? 0) + 1, | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| for (const count of requestIdCounts.values()) { | ||
| expect(count).toBe(1); | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| envOverrides: { | ||
| // Enable retries to verify they are NOT used | ||
| SNYK_MAX_ATTEMPTS: '10', | ||
| }, | ||
| }, | ||
|
|
||
| // Scenario 2 | ||
| { | ||
| name: 'timeout', | ||
| description: 'CLI times out before command finishes', | ||
| setup: ({ server }) => { | ||
| server.setResponseDelay(SERVER_DELAY_MS); | ||
| }, | ||
| expectedExitCode: EXIT_CODES.EX_UNAVAILABLE, | ||
| expectedErrorCode: 'SNYK-CLI-0026', | ||
| assert: ({ result }) => { | ||
| // Verify timeout occurred within expected bounds | ||
| expect(result.duration).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(TIMEOUT_SECS * 1000); | ||
| expect(result.duration).toBeLessThan( | ||
| (TIMEOUT_SECS + GRACE_PERIOD_SECS) * 1000, | ||
| ); | ||
| }, | ||
| envOverrides: { | ||
| SNYK_TIMEOUT_SECS: String(TIMEOUT_SECS), | ||
| }, | ||
| skip: ['container sbom scratch'], | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. hmmm do we want to skip this here? |
||
| }, | ||
|
|
||
| // Scenario 3 | ||
| { | ||
| name: 'unauthorized-401', | ||
| description: 'Backend returns 401 Unauthorized', | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Nice addition, maybe worth adding to the PR description as well. Scenario 4 too. |
||
| setup: ({ server }) => { | ||
| server.setGlobalResponse( | ||
| { | ||
| jsonapi: { version: '1.0' }, | ||
| errors: [new Snyk.UnauthorisedError('').toJsonApiErrorObject()], | ||
| }, | ||
| 401, | ||
| ); | ||
| }, | ||
| expectedExitCode: EXIT_CODES.ERROR, | ||
| expectedErrorCode: 'SNYK-0005', | ||
| skip: [ | ||
| 'container sbom scratch', | ||
| 'container test scratch', | ||
| 'container monitor scratch', | ||
| 'iac test', | ||
| 'secrets test', | ||
| 'auth', // auth doesn't need to | ||
| ], | ||
| }, | ||
|
|
||
| // Scenario 4 | ||
| { | ||
| name: 'mid-execution-maintenance', | ||
| description: 'Backend enters maintenance after initial successful requests', | ||
| setup: ({ server }) => { | ||
| const maintenanceErrorRes = { | ||
| jsonapi: { version: '1.0' }, | ||
| errors: [new Snyk.MaintenanceWindowError('').toJsonApiErrorObject()], | ||
| description: 'Maintenance window', | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| // First request succeeds, subsequent requests hit maintenance | ||
| server.setNextStatusCode(200); | ||
| server.setNextStatusCode(200); | ||
| server.setNextStatusCode(200); | ||
| server.setNextStatusCode(200); | ||
| server.setGlobalResponse( | ||
| maintenanceErrorRes, | ||
| parseInt(maintenanceErrorRes.errors[0].status), | ||
| ); | ||
| }, | ||
| expectedExitCode: EXIT_CODES.EX_TEMPFAIL, | ||
| expectedErrorCode: 'SNYK-0099', | ||
| skip: [ | ||
| 'whoami', // Single-request commands won't hit the failure | ||
| 'auth', // Single-request commands won't hit the failure | ||
| 'container monitor scratch', | ||
| ], | ||
| }, | ||
| ]; | ||
|
|
||
| function shouldSkip(scenario: ResilienceScenario, command: string): boolean { | ||
| if (!scenario.skip) return false; | ||
| return scenario.skip.some((skip) => command.startsWith(skip)); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| describe('Resilience - Consistent CLI Behavior', () => { | ||
| let server: ReturnType<typeof fakeServer>; | ||
| let baseEnv: Record<string, string>; | ||
|
|
||
| beforeAll(async () => { | ||
| const ipAddr = getFirstIPv4Address(); | ||
| const port = await getAvailableServerPort(process); | ||
| const baseApi = '/api/v1'; | ||
|
|
||
| baseEnv = { | ||
| ...process.env, | ||
| SNYK_API: 'http://' + ipAddr + ':' + port + baseApi, | ||
| SNYK_TOKEN: '123456789', | ||
| SNYK_HTTP_PROTOCOL_UPGRADE: '0', | ||
| SNYK_CFG_ORG: FAKE_ORG, | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| server = fakeServer(baseApi, baseEnv.SNYK_TOKEN); | ||
| await server.listenPromise(port); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| afterEach(() => { | ||
| server.restore(); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| afterAll(async () => { | ||
| await server.closePromise(); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| describe.each(RESILIENCE_SCENARIOS)( | ||
| '$name: $description', | ||
| (scenario: ResilienceScenario) => { | ||
| const commandsToRun = COMMANDS_UNDER_TEST.filter( | ||
| (cmd) => !shouldSkip(scenario, cmd), | ||
| ); | ||
| const commandsToSkip = COMMANDS_UNDER_TEST.filter((cmd) => | ||
| shouldSkip(scenario, cmd), | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| if (commandsToSkip.length > 0) { | ||
| it.skip.each(commandsToSkip)('"%s" (not yet consistent)', () => {}); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| it.each(commandsToRun)('"%s"', async (command) => { | ||
| const ctx: ScenarioContext = { server }; | ||
| const requiresConfigRestore = command.startsWith('auth'); | ||
|
|
||
| try { | ||
| if (requiresConfigRestore) { | ||
| ctx.savedConfig = await getCliConfig(); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| await scenario.setup(ctx); | ||
| const env = { ...baseEnv, ...scenario.envOverrides }; | ||
|
|
||
| const startTime = Date.now(); | ||
| const { code, stdout } = await runSnykCLI(command, { env }); | ||
| const duration = Date.now() - startTime; | ||
|
|
||
| // Common assertions | ||
| expect(code).toEqual(scenario.expectedExitCode); | ||
| expect(stdout).toContain(scenario.expectedErrorCode); | ||
|
|
||
| // Scenario-specific assertions | ||
| if (scenario.assert) { | ||
| scenario.assert({ | ||
| server, | ||
| result: { code, stdout, duration }, | ||
| }); | ||
| } | ||
| } finally { | ||
| server.restore(); | ||
| if (scenario.teardown) { | ||
| await scenario.teardown(ctx); | ||
| } | ||
| if (requiresConfigRestore && ctx.savedConfig) { | ||
| await restoreCliConfig(ctx.savedConfig); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| }); | ||
| }, | ||
| ); | ||
| }); | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe we want to enable this only in the tests, to avoid doing this globally.