Skip to content

Fine tune code coverage reporting #396

@georgii-tishenin

Description

@georgii-tishenin

After #394, the next step is to fine tune it. Potential next steps are:

  • Include dpsim-villas examples as tests.
  • Define coverage targets, thresholds, and comment behavior.
  • Exclude some additional files (that are not source code) from code coverage report.

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type
No fields configured for issues without a type.

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions