Apply suggestions from code review

Author: elf-pavlik

meetings/2026-06-24.md

@@ -109,10 +109,10 @@ https://github.com/w3c-cg/solid/blob/main/framework-for-proposals.md
 * JW: CRUD has diff in how container are defined, webID discussed, using OIDC ( 3 different way, include SAML, DID key, )
 
 
-* eP: CG should be an incubation space, not the place to reach consensus, this is the role of the WG
+* eP: CG should be an incubation space, not the place to reach consensus, this is the role of the WG - see links under this agenda topic.
 * JW: the ODI should not decide what is the role of WG and CG. It should be defined between them, and preferably discussed in the AC too
 * JW: would like to edit two document through CG: 1. query in Solid, would like to standardise it. 2. WebAuthn to login to Solid IdP
-* eP: Current editor of Solid spec: sarven mostly, timbl and [...] . So mostly Sarven today. 
+* eP: Current editor of the Solid Protocol spec: sarven mostly, timbl and [...] . So mostly Sarven today. 
 * ...: The spec I'm editing should be LWS compatible
 * JW: LWS has breaking change with Solid protocol